Sx90
Sx90
Sx90

Not necessarily “quickly” ... With Series X, AMD doesn’t make a 12 TF PC GPU. If that holds until the launch it’ll be the first time since N64 days that the consoles were doing more than PCs at the time.

its more than that.... AMD doesn’t make any PC 12 TF GPU (currently)

Nobody is allowed to say this, but talking about climate change in terms of CO2 emissions FROM CARS is dumb. Burning 1 hectare of grassland generates more CO2, and more dangerous pollutants than 6000 cars. Every single freaking year in Africa we burn 1 billion hectares... the equivalent of 6 trillion cars! 

Specifically, because your friend is not a business, and is not using their goods to turn a profit.

As others have said, developers want you to buy games, not play them. They think if you are playing a game, you won’t be buying a game. GeForce now makes it easier to play your games, so thats bad.

Hey, likewise i enjoy reading your thoughts : ) I’m not saying plastic surgery is for everyone but I like that there is an option available to level the playing fields. While i’m blabbing, no one is talking about the huge shift that’s taken place in men’s “beauty”. Pierce Brosnan in James Bond, or Hugh Jackman in Xmen

......errr.... lmao you are totally right! My argument I wrote there doesn’t really make any sense!

I’ll never understand this new trend of gigantic, shelf-like, Jessica Rabbit-style asses. Only celebrities can afford the clothing that will fit over this type of ass. Do they have to buy two seats on the airplane? Custom-made yoga pants?

Jlo!? Yeah no!

Not so fast! I’d argue that Kim K and her butt are what started the trend for bigger women to be fashionable and sexy. Prior to that, the “hot-girl” icons were rail thin Paris Hilton types.

Ok “Boomer”, lets lay out some facts:

This entire thing is enlightening for me. But does no one see the hypocrisy here? The idea in this article boils down to “you believe what you believe so strongly that anyone else must be a total moron.”

Ahh, you were using a straw man argument. The entire article is about how terrible Paul Ryan is for supporting autism! Why are there no comments other than mine showing condemnation for that attack?! I’ll ask you directly, do you think the position of this article is offensive and wrong?

How is this not hyper offensive and wrong? What right do you/we have to say what cause Paul Ryan can believe in? Maybe he has family members with autism or worked with autistic people and feels strongly about it. Do you really think its the moral high ground to say he’s a terrible person for believing in a cause?

How is this not hyper offensive and wrong? What right do you/we have to say what cause Paul Ryan can believe in? Maybe he has family members with autism or worked with autistic people and feels strongly about it. Do you really think its the moral high ground to say he’s a terrible person for believing in a cause?

How is this not hyper offensive and wrong? What right do you/we have to say what cause Paul Ryan can believe in? Maybe he has family members with autism or worked with autistic people and feels strongly about it. Do you really think its the moral high ground to say he’s a terrible person for believing in a cause?

Can you explain this to me? Do people pretend/believe that social security and Obamacare are NOT broken? Like, if no one touches either program everyone will win?

: ) Thanks for the civil conversation! I can’t believe we were able to understand and agree with each other’s perspectives ONLINE!!! Is this real life? Is America getting greater again? ; )

The goal was to get more people insured, and reduce the rate of growth for insurance premiums. I don’t recall there ever being an intention of not subsidizing insurance for the poor.