I'm a little in love with Hilary Duff. That is all.

I agree with this.

Particularly her death.

That makes sense to me. His first albums are fantastic with some classic songs but from 808s and Heartbreak (which I loved) forward, he's been making enjoyably complex albums that I like listening to from start to finish for the experience of it. I appreciate that he's pushing himself as a musician and it's amazing…

I think his music is as good as it has ever been, if not better, tbh. I like his early stuff, but I really like how his albums have started telling whole stories put together. I mean, the earlier stuff did too, but MBDTF and Yeezus are just awesome back to back.

You are sorely missing some Donda.

I wasn't aware that Kanye's seen as being in a career tailspin. Musically, he's still pretty solid which is mostly the only thing I'm concerned about when it comes to him. But I don't pay too much attention to his personal life because he's always been a fool. If I'm supposed to associate Kim with Yeezus (which,…

THOSE. SHOES.

This article is treating the whole thing like a tabloid scandal and doing the utmost to make this about Mia Farrow, even if that means dragging her children through the muck. It seems very unnecessary to me.

Agreed. Particularly violating was the revelation of the current names. Previously I've always heard their children referred to by their childhood names, affording them anonymity (if desired) in adulthood.

It's a little strange to read the public bios of a group of mostly-private citizens. Other than Ronan, none of these adults has chosen a public life. Sure, they were raised by a group of celebrities, but their lives are their own now and I think they should have a great deal of agency in deciding to parade their life…

Totally agreed. Children aren't collectibles that you hoard for the sake of having, dammit.

Yeah, upon reading this all of the three parents involved Previn, Farrow and Allen were unfit to be parents and should have never allowed to adopt anyone.

Honest question: why do you have a problem with that? Maybe it's just because I grew up in a rural area, but turning the death of an animal into an educational event doesn't seem like a problem to me. I'm assuming that parents had the option of not letting their kids see it if they thought it was too upsetting or…

But why is it so terrible? Dissections are a part of science classes — it's an insanely useful teaching tool to be able to actually look at the parts of an animal. It's not as if people were forced to watch this, it was available for people to see. I was a budding ecologist fascinated by top carnivores and predation…

The craziest part (in that it made me kind of gasp, not that I think it's inhumane or evil or anything) is that they had an outdoor autopsy and allowed the public to watch. Again, every single part of this story is totally scientifically sound/moral/etc., but when you say "Oh, yeah, they killed a young, health…

But it had a name!! It wasn't a giraffe, it was Marius!!