SuperheroChuck
SuperheroChuck
SuperheroChuck

I'm sorry, NPH is great, but he's no Sky. Save that role for Hugh Jackman, and cast NPH as the goofy Nathan Detroit.

Breslin is such a gifted actress. I hope people will continue to focus on that instead of obsessing over how she has boobs now.

Shit. I read the article more closely and realized she didn't pose for the painting, so I guess you're not actually mocking her. I'd edit and remove the above comment if I could, but I don't seem to be able to. My apologies.

OK, I'm sorry, but I've now combed over the comments, and I can't help but put in my own two cents: am I the only person here who thinks it's outright hypocritical of a nominally feminist website to post an article mocking a woman for her supposed taste in cheap underwear, then make her pregnancy part of the joke? In

Fun fact that many of you may be surprised to learn: this is actually legal in Texas too. There was an article about it in the San Antonio Express-News that I remember reading several years back, discussing whether it was legal for a trans woman to flash her breasts in public. The author's answer was "Yes, but it's a

What porn are you watching? If you surf any of the popular free sites like redtube, xnxx, and pornhub—which, let's be honest, do represent the overwhelming populist norm of the porn industry—you will see close to zero condoms. The porn you do see with condoms is often very clearly low-grade—poorly shot, out-of-shape

Well, obviously, more accurate representation in pop culture isn't going to end racism, but I think it's the kind of thing that needs to be part of the fight against oppression. Maybe a small part, but a necessary part. Yeah, there are other, more important things, but the discussion at hand happened to be about

I think it's a fictional piece.

Yes, yes it is. A *white* penis in blackface. And I am slightly more disinclined now to believe Allen's claims of not being aware of her racism.

You've come closest to hitting on the essential problem: capitalism basically precludes the possibility that a corporation will put people before money, or even put people and money on the same footing.

I will be running for Mayor of Austin next election, vote for me! I will get rid of all hippys, liberals, potheads, blacks, gays & feminists

Think of it as a way of you supporting the underdog as well as supporting free speech in America, by helping me keep the electric on until I get back on my feet, consider it a loan if you will, as I believe I have a reality show just around the corner, and if you help me out, I promise to invite you on my reality show

You win the fucking internet today.

In clearer terms: I wholly reject the proposition that genocide is a necessary condition to the creation of a thriving state. That's classic post-hoc rationalization.

False. Just because the present follows the past does not necessarily mean that every aspect of our present can be attributed to every action in our past. Post hoc ergo propter hoc is one of the most basic logical fallacies.

Clearly not. There was no way those brown people were ever going to discover science, because they were brown. Clearly, it was necessary for us to kill all of them and steal their land so that the world could advance into the future. It's not like science and technology can be shared with other countries by peaceful

Seriously—does the world *have* journalistic integrity laws? How much bullshit is Rupert Murdoch Inc. going to have to fling at us before we can finally agree as a species that the man and all of his subsidiaries should be immediately destroyed?

I'm actually American. Born and raised in Texas, currently living in New York. Never even set foot on Australian soil. Just pointing out to you that if you're going to go all the way back to how our countries were founded and all the dark shit in our pasts (colonial violence and racism), Australia and America are

Yes, and everyone knows that makes you a dirty, dirty whore! Porn is inferior to retail!