Sumada
Sumada
Sumada

Positive outlook: They hear the outrage from gamers and are considering not doing it.

That is more accurate than what I said. They are pretty common now that I think about it, but I know very few people who don't have any TVs with HDMI at all. It does cause some added inconvenience that will limit which TVs some people can use though I guess. Now that I think of it, sometime I visit my friend and we

Eh, I don't know about that. I only had a CRT television until two or so years ago (one that didn't support HDMI), and I didn't have a computer monitor with any inputs because my only computer was a laptop. Getting gaming consoles was a priority for me over upgrading my TV (playing games > better graphics), so I

Yeah, I'm assuming they'll reveal more. Some people consider it a spoiler to reveal the hidden characters, so they'll probably do like they have in the past and announce them one at a time. There are some pretty glaring omissions currently, so I can't imagine they're done.

Yeah, I didn't really buy it with gaming as a primary focus, since I've done most of my gaming on consoles. But I figured if it would work, I might as well take advantage of the deal.

That's why I was asking, because it didn't seem like a normal thing.

I like the setting; I'm not crazy about the way the gameplay looks. I'd prefer XII's or XIII's (blasphemy, I know) gameplay over what looks like Kingdom Hearts style gameplay. Heck, X was good even, although I support trying to do new things. I hate though how someone decided "new" and "innovative" meant "real-time

That's not really a fair comparison I think—it's certainly not hack-and-slash combat like God of War (which is a good thing for me, I don't really enjoy those games), but it's a far cry from MMO style combat. I mean, I spent more time in The Witcher 2 dodging than anything else, which is one of the things you're

Wasn't the Witcher 3 confirmed on PS3 before the One was even announced?

So, I'm probably out of luck then? Oh well. I'll probably still pick it up on consoles eventually.

Yep, it's a laptop. I'm really more of a console gamer, I just wanted to see if I could play this on the laptop I own for school/personal use. I'm pretty sure I can't swap out the GPU I have (I tend to assume I can't swap out anything on an Apple laptop), but if it's enough to play something I play some games (mostly

So, I don't understand how to compare graphics cards really. (Usually more of a console gamer.) I have a "NVIDIA GeForce 320M 256 MB graphics" (2010 13" Macbook Pro, but I have windows installed that I can use for games) according to my system information. Amazon's requirements for Papo y Yo say "NVIDIA GeForce

It's quite different depending on what they mean. Based on their comments last night, I'm assuming they mean it's the same as the PS3 and 360—they don't provide any systemic DRM, but the publisher can implement their own DRM outside of the system (like online passes or something similar to an online pass). If they

I still think this is good, as long as this statement is true: "That’s [DRM] not something that we’re going to dictate or mandate or control or implement." If they're not implementing it on a system-based level, we're in the same situation we were in last generation. Because they're limited to what the system

Are you talking about a controller or a camera? If the controller is separate, that actually is a huge deal, as it almost erases the price difference between the two systems. If the camera is separate, that probably isn't a big deal for a lot of people.

Hey, Kotaku! (Or an ambitious commenter, as long as you're not just going to give me snark...I guess the snark goes for Kotaku as well.) You know what would be nice? A straight-up fact sheet comparing the consoles once E3 is done. Primarily the PS4 and the XB1, but if you want to throw in the WiiU, I wouldn't fight it.

Doh, I'm stupid; I just realized I misread your comment, haha. I thought you said you didn't understand what I meant about fundamental. Now I feel like I look like some kind of patronizing jerk explaining to you what you already know!

Whether better is subjective or not on in terms of aesthetics (by which I mean philosophy of art, not how pretty it is), it is subjective in terms of what console people would prefer to buy. If one console has more games I personally like, that console has a better selection for me, and that's subjective.

That's definitely true. But a decent number of people did buy the PS3 even when it was more expensive than the Xbox. And while hardcore gamers may not like the Kinect, some people may see the Kinect pack-in as a good thing that saves them from having to buy it down the road.

Eh, I kind of feel like this is unfair. Did the PS4 have a better showing at E3 today? Definitely. But Microsoft came through on their promise to show games (well, I didn't count to see if there were 15, but they showed games and I wasn't disappointed in that aspect). The most exciting things Sony showed were also