Yes, but more importantly they polled 3000 tablet users and found out that those tablet users that played games before they owned tablets play handheld/console games less than they did before they had a tablet.
Yes, but more importantly they polled 3000 tablet users and found out that those tablet users that played games before they owned tablets play handheld/console games less than they did before they had a tablet.
Okay, now that I've actually read the original source:
Thanks!
The source link links back to this page. :( I wanted to look at the full results...
Or, you could just do the easy thing and look at the part of the website where they say who they are, which includes more people, their Twitters and their XBL/PSN names.
The prejudice against class action suits and lawyers in this comment thread is incredible. There are so many things wrong with what people are saying, but I'm just going to stick to the conspiracy theory "he's just trying to steal your information" angle.
Sony has our email addresses. If they sue sony, they can use discovery to get a better list...
So, what's the actual benefit of this to me as a consumer?
I'm not sure what you mean by a contest, I don't think it is a contest either.
That's probably their angle. And maybe as a marketing decision that was justified, although I think it would have been a cooler ad for me if they had kept the mystery. I picked up on it pretty quickly though (like the first or second line once they got into the room), maybe it isn't as obvious to other people.
Well, yeah, but all advertisements are overly expensive gags in that sense. I'm not judging the product, because there was no new product.
That would have got a laugh. They could have kept calling it "him," then the picture at the end could be Kevin Butler.
Great ad, although I'm not sure how much I like that they actually used a name. I kind of liked how up until then, the player was sort of a mysterious unnamed person.
Which humble bundle?
There are a lot more good indie games that don't get the exposure Minecraft does. I'm not sure what your perspective is or how many indie games you've played, but there are websites and services that can pick out the quality stuff from the stuff that isn't worthwhile.
Oh, for some reason I read your comment to be "a hostile review of rage." I don't know why.
Those quotes are paraphrased though, the actual questions weren't that hostile. I mean, that is really the line between a hard-hitting question and a hostile one—how you present it. Compare:
Well, the "gut check" kotaku posted of the game was positive.
Hit the magnifying glass in the corner.
I dunno, I just haven't heard anything about this game that makes it stand out to me, plus the reviews at Ars and Joystiq sound fairly convincing to me. I don't understand what this game's purpose is. It sounds just like a less interesting version of Borderlands, and I wasn't so crazy about Borderlands that I would…