SarshelYam
The Yam!
SarshelYam

It’s Ganondorf...not Ganon. Consider yourself doubly spoiled. ;)

I’m clearly in the minority, but no way in heck is Breath of the Wild the greatest game of all time, it simply isn’t. Does it accomplish anything to move the needle for the series? Sure, a bit. Does it do anything new for the genre? Not at all, it’s derivative of many others that came before it & is really only doing

Totally agreed. Heck, it seems like Dante’s Inferno was the first real test of this line we don’t cross, and unfortunately its last as that game had some INSANE content that pushed what could/could not be done in the medium.

Yeah, uh...that’s the Sheikah Slate. It’s basically a tablet/smart device. I’m with you, this isn’t my Zelda anymore.

Not sure that’s true (PS5 player here).

I don’t think it’s that at all, and more closely aligned with the reality that developers are doing their best to create experiences for an ever-increasing market with a multitude of hardware configurations that have been more & more demanding of today’s games.

Lulu has both endeared and entire army of angry/rabid fans on one side of this dispute, and risen to the single-most unprofessional “insider” status amidst it all. I’m not sure why this is okay, but in nearly every other company I’ve worked for a share of internal comms like this (true or otherwise) would be a

Let’s not split hairs. Starfield was never announced to be coming to anything other than it’s coming to something.

I’m more concerned about the next Elder Scrolls, a series I’ve enjoyed on PlayStation for some time now. The next Fallout too...Doom...Wolfenstein.

I’m not sure what the shock & awe value of these articles are. From a sales perspective this is a far safer bet for the manufacturer & friendly to the consumer who can freely choose which version of the game they need to buy (albeit separately).

I find it curious that anyone going into something Justin Roiland-based would expect anything less than excessive. While I agree the QoL options for those players ill-prepared to endure the constant banter is a good thing, it’s still silly that we’re even here. Every single trailer & gameplay clip prepared them for

First of all, this is ridiculous response to not having a solid library of first party offerings since launch. There are a few, but it’s clear Microsoft’s priorities are in acquisition & subs, not actual in-house content.

Bring back a beautiful physical edition, please & thank you!

What’s the gain here that doesn’t create the same exact issue the FTC is suing for?

Exactly this! How anyone can compare legacy multi-platform studios to internal exclusive studios & IPs is beyond me. CoD & Uncharted do not equate.

With Phil’s double-speak, I wouldn’t be so sure.

How is the argument still comparing legacy single-platform exclusives from internal development teams, to the prospect of removing legacy multi-platform releases from multi-platform developers down to a single platform? These two are not created equally.

Curious, would you buy all 11? Seems like a lot for a launch, with plenty more coming shortly thereafter.

It received plenty of support, all things considered. Like, enough to have over 500 games. Not sure anyone is equipped to even make much of a dent through a library like that, but eh, to each their own?

It’s a completely different combat system for many reasons, but what I feel most of these reviews fail to mention is that there’s some instant expectation that it was always to follow the Arkham formula, when the devs said this isn’t connected in story or mechanic at all. There are still slowdown finishers, so that’s