They kinda look like they’re about to have a dance-off.

I must know as well!

“Yes, and?” - kids in 2030

Tarantino can go die in a fire.

Once again, if you have any doubt that another system could be sustainable in the long run, please look at a selection of other first-world countries who have had single-payer healthcare for decades. These discussions on finances vs. care are both horrific and completely alien to me.

Awesome! Timezones mean I won’t be able to see it live, but I’ll definitely look out how it turns out in the morning!

Do they plan to have any components land? First stage boosters and/or core? Second stage?

Not if you repeat the mantra: “I’ll never die, I’ll never die.”

I’m surprised that “how do I avoid paying taxes?” isn’t among the most commonly googled tax questions!

Why do they even want to release a rebuttal? The memo fizzled out spectacularly, why give it more time in the spotlight? Whoever’s stupid enough to buy that it’s some kind of smoking gun (all ~35% of you) aren’t going to be swayed by a Democrat rebuttal anyway, and everyone else already thinks it’s stupid.

Ironically, Trump probably did more to unite everyone behind more funding for the NHS with this one tweet than any UK pundit could have achieved.

What I’m seeing here is an accusation that information was withheld from FISC in obtaining those warrants? If that were true, shouldn’t that just be argued in court when Mueller drops his load?

No, I make about twice what she does but I don’t put in exactly twice what she does. I put in a bit more (percentage-wise) but that brings our discretionary amounts more in line. At the end of the day we tried to find something that seemed fair for the both of us.

Just to add my voice to this - not that it’s needed, judging from the length of the comment thread - I live in France and my dad is getting old. Now this is a guy who started out from nothing and bootstrapped his way upwards all his life.

Never thought I’d see the day when Fox fact-checked Trump.

That’s a great point and I’m sorry for your loss. The legal regime my wife and I are under - which is the default where we live - essentially states that from the day we marry, anything we earn belongs to us in equal parts, and all of it goes to the survivor if one passes away. In that sense, the division of accounts…

I make a bit over twice what she does. We tried to strike a balance between contributing a similar “effort” (i.e. share of how much we make) and having comparable “play-around” money left (i.e. how much each of us gets to keep in his account).

Reason tells me that we’re better off together in this increasingly multipolar world. Having said that, and speaking as one from the rest of Europe, I’m not sure I want the UK to abandon Brexit. They shat all over Europe before the vote (going back decades, to be honest) and always refused to actually be in. No, they…

You’re right, I forget that this isn’t a thing everywhere but we live in a country with mandatory public pension contributions. They’re taken straight out of our paychecks and never even hit our bank accounts. In that sense, retirement’s already taken care of.

You make a lot of assumptions on the country we live in and the terms of our marriage contract. Without disclosing any details that are none of your business, for the sake of any readers let me confirm that there are definitely cases where, even when married, separate investment accounts are legally a thing.