That’s how they should work. Here’s footage of how they actually work:

There’s definitely a difference. I have an ‘80 Corvette and an ‘02 Z3 M Coupe, and the difference in low rpm throttle response is very noticeable. The corvette already starts getting rumbly the moment your foot barely touches the pedal, whereas the Z3M has a slight delay between when you press the pedal and the engine…

Distant cousins?

Ooooo ballet!

ヽ(。_°)ノ

Eh, no V8.

So Aston Martin just Bentleyed Porsche, Ferrari, and McLaren. Nice.

It wasn’t really much of a move up market if they’re comparing the C4 to the Ferrari 308. I mean, the late C3 competed against the Ferrari 308 quite well: http://media.caranddriver.com/files/de-lorea…

But dude, dont you know that stance is, like, art n’ shit? A lot of art goes into making a car worse. Whole tons of art

A tad bit off topic, but isn’t it kind of saddening that the GT40 gets so much recognition for winning one particular race in a series when the Shelby Daytona was the first American car to bring home a title in the world sports car championship? Don’t worry sweet Shelby. RodRAEG remembers.

Ah green, the color of money.

Lots of hoes in these comments.

Well, not really to make the car safer, just make it meet regulations. If GT1 were still around, the GT-type cars would be absurdly quick.

“44,000 deadweight tonnage shop”

But seriously, how does it compare to a Golf GTI? Or to a 1le F-body Camaro? Has no one driven all of these cars?

One of the few vettes where I feel like fender flares would actually detract from its appearance. For its body, it’s that perfect combo of sleek and bulge. Sleekbulge.

Yeah, it makes no sense for the Ferrari and Ford to receive increased restrictions (weight penalty and boost/rpm reduction) and STILL be faster than they were in final qualifying. It may as well have been a different classification between the turbo cars and the naturally aspirated cars.

TTV6>V8*

It’s italian. It was going to burn either way.

Hehe ya caught me.