Considering that approximately 500 horsepower is about the limit you can put down with those tires, good luck with more than twice that limit. You’ll be smoked on the street by a stock scat pack.
Considering that approximately 500 horsepower is about the limit you can put down with those tires, good luck with more than twice that limit. You’ll be smoked on the street by a stock scat pack.
Mothball those Mofos damn well, we’re probably going to need them.
Just paint her green already, give her to the Army.
Glad your okay Sean. This is great reminder for me to gear up tomorrow. My Abarth isn’t back from the shop yet and my rental coverage runs out today. I’ll be commuting on the good ol WR250 for next few business days, these 31 degree mornings are going to suck.
Take your pic or maybe choose the Impreza if you get a lot of snow. Both are boring but decent little cars. They are cheap to maintain and get to where they are going without bother.
Live front axle fo sho. Hey Ford, don’t even bother if she doesn’t have a live axle.
The V10 R8 is cheaper than the techno-shit NSX too.
No
They still sell this as a new 2016 car.
So for $168,400, you buy a parts bin “slow” supercar to help Honda Advertise Accord and MDX power trains? Who in the hell will be buying the NSX based on that premise? People don’t buy slow super-cars because they have mass production parts.
The original NSX was a reliable V6 Ferrari. It was a better car than the Corvette and quicker too, especially on the track and street. Honda built a brilliant platform for the win.
That’s my exact point, the NSX was a reliable V6 Ferrari. It was a better car than the Corvette and quicker too, especially on the track and street. Honda built a brilliant platform for the win.
If someone is spending that much money on a sports car or what Honda calls its super car, wouldn’t you think that basic performance perimeters would be considered? If plebian $60K base Corvettes are more than competitive with their pushrod V8s then why spend twice that amount?
There are really nice 2015 ATSs out there for $30K. Here’s your Camaro with better viability. The turbo 2.0L can be mail-order-tuned for 340 horsepower.
They moved on about six years ago.
The original was a light weight, mid-engine v6 sports car for $60K. The driving dynamics were fantastic and it pulled off a 0-60 of 5.7 seconds. It wasn’t 911-turbo fast but it was faster than a base C4 Z51 Corvette (0-60 of 6 seconds).
One question, will it be faster than a base Stingray Z51?
This is essentially the Camaro platform correct?
Covering a target in dust doesn’t count, the bomb looks like it hit 10-15 meters away from the targeted building.
Make a 1500 short bed, I’ll take one along with three of my partners.