Pilotman
PilotMan
Pilotman

I did and took it slow while taking a ton of pics along the way. That bike comes from a great time during the mid-80s, they still used simple carbs but they had made the switch to digital ignition.

I really like my WR250R with decent suspension. It makes for a better daily ride compared to a 600 with basic suspension.

Because I don’t want to die, was the Jalopnik consensus.

Emergency lane change maneuver, just drive through it.

Noob

Try four:

Think about it, if you want a motorcycle that is quick, stops well, turns well, is easy to handle, gets good fuel mileage and is an all around good motorcycle; then you don’t buy a Harley.

Don’t forget, it’s a lifestyle.

Very cool.

My Abarth is a prefect little car. My only complaint is that it went through the stock Pirellis too fast. If the Giulia is as reliable I would be happy.

I bought my 2002 Camaro SS for $33K. $38K for this much car is actually quite awesome. Hurray for V6 rentals that bring the cost down for the GT.

How much did it end up costing you, if you don’t mind me asking.

F-16Ds have ground collision avoidance radar systems but not traffic avoidance systems.

It was a joke.

The 150 remains landed on someone’s lawn, that same someone is also saying they knew the passenger(s). They are also saying both aircraft crashed in the MOA.

My post was a reply to:

What other facts do we need? Cessna 150 + F-16 + Active MOA = what happened today.

There are a very limited number of reasons that would explain a Cessna 150 and a USAF F-16 colliding over a military operations area (MOA). The Cessna pilot didn’t check to see if the MOA was active and flew into an military training route, F-16 pilot didn’t see the slow Cessna.

Joke implying airspace violation would not justify collision.

I’m sure there are a number of circumstances contributing to the collision. What stands out to me is a Cessna 150 flying along at 100 kts with zero warning that they were about to be destroyed by a F-16 flying at 600 kts.