PetticoatDespot
Petticoat Despot
PetticoatDespot

I did not "make this a sexism" issue. I pointed out that the information being reported as facts in the article are not accurate, but they are being reported as facts by many news organizations because those news organizations are sexist and have ignored previous calls for a policy change. I expect better from a

This has been going on for a year and a half. A group of conservatives have been using tumblr— and possibly other social media— to use facebook's reporting system to report drag queens with fake names. This isn't a rollout or a new policy. This is people finally caring because it's affecting men for the first time.

LOL, no, they're about "transparency." When They say privacy, they mean they won't sell your data. But everything you post is public. That's not what privacy means.

There's a Facebook setting that allows you to filter messages from non-friends into your "other" mailbox, where you never see them. It's pretty standard for women to set their account that way so that people can only message us if we friend them. She can still send you messages but you would never see them.

They're librotarians, but nice try, bro.

I am honestly tired of people claiming that this is a new rule, especially while male. Women have been complaining about this rule for a year and a half. Burlesque performers and gendered violence victims gave up trying to get people to listen but suddenly men area affected and my freaking Supervisor is on board, it's

Of course, based on the timing at which the allegations begin, the rapist will know who is behind it and potentially target her for additional harassment or attacks. Don't tell rape victims what they NEED to do or even should do, unless the thing that they need to do or should do is "make the decision that will keep

They are targeting *a* survivor, falsely blaming her for the list because she's an advocate. Not sure how that gives her credibility.

"anonymous or unsupported accusations, threats, or damaging commentary made by one student or students against other students could rise to a disciplinary issue."

I've always had a regular doctor. Even when I did not have health insurance and only afford occasional trips to the doctor, I had a regular doctor. I recently got some insurance and I wasn't able to stay with my regular doctor— because that's what happens when you change insurance providers. I've probably had 6

Now playing

I haven't seen a video of that, but here's a video of her hoolahooping while performing. It's rather astounding.

Gluten allergy does exist. Most people who claim to have a gluten sensitivity do not actually have gluten allergy and yes, I want to smack those people too. Wheat allergy is in the big 8 allergens and it contains 4 proteins that people can be allergic to, including gluten. If someone is claiming gluten allergy or

You are omitting facts that are inconvenient to your stance, after coming here to confirm your bias. It was obvious from your first post that you don't even understand what victim blaming is PLUS you decided that despite mutual violence, the woman is not possibly a victim. Pointing out that the facts are not all in

You have the events out of order. They each hit the other. Both committed crimes against the other. Stop arguing in bad faith or at least cover it up better than you do. It's obvious that your motivation is to excuse actual rapists.

So you didn't read the part where he said that it is inexcusable to run someone over with a truck? Or the part where she was also a victim at some point in this incident? It's hypocritical to question if there are additional crimes against her because like the guy she ran over, she committed a crime?

Gee. Thanks for letting us know what works for you. Clearly, we never would have thought of that without your help. You are such a genius. Of course, that didn't work for the people shown above and in fact, the people shown above are proof that that method frequently backfires. Too bad you didn't read the article

Again, she didn't equate all men. You are setting up that straw man to excuse your own hatred of women.

LOL No.

Well, that's the longer "Not All Men" derail attempt that I've ever seen. She didn't say all men. She used the term for the demographic. And yes, the generalization is true and quite frankly, you clearly don't give a shit about those issues, since you only care to try to silence women who talk about them.

You seem to be projecting your hatred of women onto her. She didn't even show signs of hating a single man— except the asshole who just Not All Menned because like you, he doesn't grasp the concept of demographics.