Of course, his stated argument is that 7% of women who get abortions get them for medical reasons and 7% is "extremely rare" therefore, a woman who claims that she had medical reasons couldn't fall into that 7% and must be lying (implying that she's a slut and baby killer), except that she's telling the truth so that…

So you believe that someone is lying based solely on that person having the opinion that your opinion of her doesn't matter to her? And you think that matters to her that you believe that she's lying because she doesn't care about your opinion?

I have to own a separate bra just for airline travel or go through security with no bra on. He should be glad I bought the bra and am not flashing him to show him the reason that this is required.

Or because those kids died early under a catch-all diagnosis like "consumption" or "the vapors" or whatever.

Food allergens are typically proteins contained in a food, with any given food containing multiple proteins. For instance, gluten is a protein found in wheat and other foods, and can be an allergen, but it is not the only potential allergen in wheat. Just like gluten can be in non-wheat foods, the peanut allergen…

Sadly, there is a long history of "slave contracts" being used to gaslight an abuse victim. The contracts generally say that the slave consents to any behavior by the master; then if she complains, he pulls out the contract and reminds her that she consented. There have been a few kidnapping victims who were abused,…

So the solution, as expected, merely hides the obvious symptom while still allowing harassment through the notification system. Great job, Gawker Media. Let us know when you hire some competent female techies and start listening to their solutions.

Step 1: hire experienced female tech workers who are affected by problems like this.

Adjunct Professor Andrew's triple X clam paws with wasabi creamed walnuts.

110% manufactured charges that she used a sexual harassment reporting system to retaliate against you for being a catty bitch talking nasty about her behind her back? LUL Yeah, you do know that in cases that aren't proven or for which retaliation is two-way, he solution is to tell both parties that the other was wrong…

Since harassment is more than simply flirting and is actually "flirting after you've been told to stop," "flirting because you know it makes her uncomfortable," "retaliating because she didn't respond to your 'flirting' the way you wanted," or "making threats if she doesn't fool around with you," I figure you probably…

According to some crazed person with a lady name on the internet looking for attention.

Under 2%, actually, and most of those don't accuse a specific person. The 8% stat is the false conviction rate from a study prior to the availability of DNA evidence and protections against racism in court.

How much of a sexist ass do you have to be to declare it "uncommon" for 18% of women to get raped? If, in fact, that statistic were accurate, that would not denote "uncommon," bit it's still low. You also arguing that we treat all women as inherently unreliable witnesses to crimes committed against them, which harms…

Huh. I didn't realize that A Voice For Men was part of the 4chan family! The things you learm from sexists on the internet!

Yes. Your posting history, even in this thread alone.

There is a difference between assuming and drawing a conclusion based on your words and behavior. You claim that something is logical because you believe it,or illogical because women other than you believe it. That honestly is your argument. You're rational because you are you and women (other than you) are…

Post hoc ergo procter hoc. Even you know that your analogy is false and you state it as proof that someone else is a terrible person. You even confuse yourself with how bad your logic is.

LOVE IT! In one fell swoop, you made a series of false analogies and then a false claim that proves that rape culture exists— as proof that rape culture doesn't exist!

LOL yes, it is. However, refusing to accept any evidence as evidence is a false appeal to your own expertise. Go back to reddit where people don't talk back against false rhetoric.