What does his intent matter?

Clear out all of your browser cookies.

Wow. You dudes really do think you’re clever, don’t you.

SHockingly, men and women have different life experiences and thus make decisions based on different information. If a woman parked 100 naked women outside the GOP convention, it would be a political piece with banners to get information through their thick heads. So yes, it would have meaning and thus be less…

Yes, there is actually a large cat contingent in the Jezebel commentariat. I’m glad to see that others are catching on.

Let me guess: you’re a guy.

and prior to that “Anyone who says they know what does or what doesn’t cause autism is simply not basing that on facts”

IIRC, there is now one person with Asperger’s in a position of power, who was added after outrage from autistic people that Autism Speaks speaks for autistic people based on not having talked to any autistic people about their stances.

This panel is intended to emphasize that women and men need to work together to advance this cause.

“Establishment.”

You’re asking that she harm her career and she may have a legal obligation to work with her label’s assigned photographer. If she refused to work with him, they could just pair him with someone with less power.

People think of allergies as hay fever, and thus anyone who claims to have serious allergies are whining hypochondriacs. The worst are the people who say that peanut allergic kids shouldn’t be allowed in school because their precious baby likes peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Seriously? Your child needs peanut…

False. Obama was taken out of context. Biden said that he thought that the President shouldn’t nominate anyone, not that he wouldn’t confirm anyone. Bork was not confirmed because he did not pass muster.

Actually, his behavior towards Clinton in the debates is pretty sexist. I do accuse him of running a sexist campaign.

Not made up. Observed. You, however, made up that it wasn’t observed.

That would indeed be smarter on his part. I completely agree. There is literally no set of words he could say that wouldn’t be mansplaining.

Because it presumes that there are, in fact, women voting for Clinton because she has a vagina, based on sexist tropes that women are stupid, flighty, shallow, and irrational. The reality is that many women believe that Clinton is the best candidate on women’s issues— because she’s a woman.

I have yet to see any Clinton supporters state that they intend to vote their vagina. This is not actually a thing and I wish that people would stop claiming that it is to dismiss our opinions. It’s extremely sexist. Even women who say that they want to vote for her because she’s a woman aren’t supporting her because…

Sigh. Why would people vote for women because they are women, without even reviewing their stances on women’s right?

Can’t we have a single conversation about Hillary’s ability to serve without her uterus wandering into it?