Yes yes, very convincing. I paraphrase someone above who is correcting women on what the corrected women believe based on an assumption that he is so much smarter than women that he knows what female strangers' thought process are. And you paraphrase me to imply a bunch of things that you literally have no basis for…
Right. You know from personal experience how women are treated. You, as a man, know that from personal experience.
I don't know why girls get so bent out of shape when this happens to them - especially considering the fact that there are a ton of women out there who claim they're geeks/nerds/gamers/etc. when they're not.
Hurr hurr hurr! I'm a guy so I know what women's life experiences are because I know fucking everything. Mo mommy and all my teachers told me so, that's why women women tell me how they are treated, I correct them. Because I are a man and that makes me smartzz! Hurr hurr hurr.
Actually, as a female gamer, I can tell you on authority that you are a fucking asshole.
OK, no. Do not call this dude a crybaby and present pictures of crying boys as illustration. That is shaming him for "acting like a woman."
Just ignore the troll. There is no gender bias in Women's Studies and no stereotyping of men. These are claims by men who feel discriminated against because for the first time, they don't win by default and people point out that them having sad feelings isn't the same thing as institutional oppression. It is true that…
Well, you do live up to your handle, at least. Your comment makes no sense at all.
You asked a question that was irrelevant and offensive based on the information presented in the article that you responded to. Your attempt to "inform yourself" when you have just been informed that asking for such information is irrelevant and offensive is an attempt to validate your existing position in order to…
But here is what we are talking about in this case:
When you claim that people are looking for things to get mad about instead of even considering whether they might be mad for a reason, you are dismissing their stance because of who they are, in this case, dismissing their stance because they are a minority who has just pointed out a way in which they are…
No, one is adjectives and one is nouns. They are grammatically quite different and your transparent attempt to shame people for not putting up with your bigotry against them is pathetic.
Male/female are adjectives. Man/woman are nouns. Male/female tends to denote sex while man/woman tends to denote gender. However, trying to separate people by sex who told you their gender is trying to bring their genitalia into the discussion. Now, if you were in conversation with someone and they asked you about…
Yeah it really bothers me when people think that just because they're an ally... it entitles them to be a dick.
Oh, I see. So his job is to be an asshole to stir up controversy, but if people respond to him in a way that is appropriate to an asshole, ie by creating a controversy, they are wrong for being "vitriolic."
Do we really need all the vitriol?
Oo should we google misandry too? That's totally a thing. Oh and creep shaming! Let's google creep shaming!
Again, solely because you feel that overweight people are treated more harshly by society. That's subjective.
My sister, former vegan, former PETA supporter and activist, used to issue "blood curdling moos" at the dinner table when I ate the food that was prescribed for both of us by our doctors. Shockingly, refusing to follow our recommended diet caused her to have brain and nerve damage, something that I have avoided by…
