Ohhai, I'm a person who is required to eat meat for medical reasons, you self-righteous, ill-informed, abelist asshole. Your opinion is ignorant and thus not equally valid. Do you know what opinions like your did? Gave my sister brain and nerve damage because she made the "ethical" decision to not follow the advice of…

Yes, yes. A 5 year old having been exposed to human anatomy = child molestation. Your claim that he's an idiot? That was projection, idiot.

Do you have a right to pee in public? Newp. False equivalency.

Yeah yesterday's "I will punch you back up your mom's vagina" was far more creative.

You really need to learn what it looks like when people lose their shit. Hint: they don't remain calm while chuckling at you.

He didn't get emotional about it and even if he had, that wouldn't have made you edgy. Troll better, moron.

By commenting on an article, you implicitly acknowledge it. In this case, you acknowledged it and then downplayed its contents in favor of a vague promise that "the community" is taking steps to become more open to women.

You're in the minority here for a reason. Perhaps if you listened to people's actual complaints you would understand why. Get a clue, heartless ass.

Did anyone else notice that John McCain was the ref? ANYONE?

I don't know about majority, but this definitely is a version that conservatives are teaching in church and trying to get taught in public high schools as "more accurate" than "liberal" history which says "silly" things like that slavery wasn't a benevolent institution.

It wasn't Bobby Jindal, was it?

Vanity publishing has a long history, as in some of the first print publications were vanity press. The internet has simply lowered the financial overhead.

So now you are agreeing with the article while insulting the author for having done something that happened only in your imagination, and that's why it's ok for you to make a "joke" at the expense of trans people, Jenner, other Jenner, and strong women. Nope. It's not a joke if you meant it and you meant it. Stop.

If they do the same for men, as has been mentioned repeatedly, then it isn't chivalry; it's manners. You don't get to redefine chivalry to back up you liking it.

And reacting poorly because we didn't take it the way that they claim they intended is a show of privilege. Quite often they are lying about what the intended anyway.

Good thing that you are here to speak for all black women while calling all other women in the thread white without having any basis— even shows of privilege— for doing so.

There's a difference between manners and fake, infantalizing, objectifying chivalry. Maybe you need to increase your caffeine intake so your brain will turn on.

By your logic, if someone chooses not to take old-timey manners, then they are tacitly saying that cyber rape threats are a good thing, because they didn't exist back then, but do now.

Nope, actual survivors are the people that you are blaming for your "rape" claim which is not very believable because you've already lied repeatedly.

So thank you for blaming me for my rape.