Well, first, jobs are not pronouns. Someone performing a job can be referred to by that job, but that doesn’t make it a pronoun.
First, mad props for the Bingo Bronson moniker. Love him.
It’s always funny to me when people defend unnecessary violence with “well life is full of unnecessary violence so it’s just being realistic”. Have these people not heard of NARRATIVE? Building up your characters and plots only to kill them off is not somehow more realistic.
You know, you could just admit you don't know what you're talking about. You're making it obvious enough as it is.
Exactly what point do you think they’re trying to make about brutality and the pointlessness of life? If it’s simply that life is brutal and pointless, then that’s not a particularly creative, original, or compelling point to make, and even if it was, it's a point that's been beaten to death by this show already.
This is true. He needs to sit down with his fiance *now* and be honest about what’s going on.
As another female lawyer dating a guy who’s accomplished different, “lesser” things than I have - and has a wonderful respectful relationship anyway - I’d like to emphatically echo Dr. Nerdlove here and tell you to drop that scrub like he’s an objection you know you didn’t have any basis to make. (ha! lawyer jokes!)
The first guy shouldn’t be getting married in the first place.
You did the right thing. Revenge fuel sex? Huge red flag.
Nah, he’s only 2 years in and he’s describing the relationship as an obligation more than anything else. He feels he owes her something and he’s worried about how this fits in with her past.
If you’ve reached a point where you’re asking “Should I leave my fiance for my crush...” the answer is yes and no.
He was so obviously guessing at what they wanted him to say. They knew he wasn’t very bright and didn’t know what was going on. His mother doesn’t even know how to handle the fact that she cant get in touch with him or his lawyers...its all just fucking INSANE. That is the biggest story in this show. Steve Avery, I…
Despite how awfully it turned out, there was a story here with just a little reframing (that the author probably was not capable of pulling off). The piece could have worked - with the same sources, even! - if Arnold had framed it to explore how people get into such denial about monsters like Holtzclaw. Instead we got…
You are incredibly rude, Jia. This isn’t the first time you’ve acted this way towards commenters.
Does Gawker have some sort of affirmative action program for insecure dimwits?
I like how Blanket was able to say it in two sentences. I should have read that comment first before reading that whole essay.
That was the point of the essay. Ever heard of tl;dr summary? Cause that was one.
I’m supporting Clinton because I think she’ll be a better general election candidate than Sanders and I think she’ll be a better president too. However I am also supporting her because she’s a woman. And everytime I see any sort of criticism of that line of thinking it just reinforces my belief that we have to…