Because he's a scientist and at least 50% of America does not believe in science.
Because he's a scientist and at least 50% of America does not believe in science.
Hasn't this been a thing since forever? I remember always shopping just on the 4-5 days leading up to Christmas when I was a kid, mainly because we relied on our procrastinatey dad to take us shopping.
I won't bash these people and their obvious struggles. I extend no such courtesy to religion.
Great point. I think a lot of people fail to see the complex ways in which religion affects peoples lives and just default to the "religion is stupid" end. You can't help somebody simply by telling them they're stupid.
Let me be super clear about this: I think everyone should be allow to love whomever they want and be a religious person. I don't think that religious sect of any kind should discriminate against gay people. With that being said, I understand how and why a person might decide they want to live within their communities…
It said the study monitored their internet usage, so maybe the religious porn-watchers refused to participate? "Wanna be in a study that tracks which sites you visit on the internet?" "Heck no!"
Misandryghazi!!!!!
Also, you have all these things you want to accomplish if you are elected, and once you are you find out the opposition don't want to work with you, and you also realize some of the shit you wanted to do will fuck the country up if you go after them. Not an easy job, you'll never please everybody.
Excellent point!
I like how people in the comments are whining about male discrimination, when in Ireland, it's perfectly acceptable to keep dead women on life support to keep their unborn fetuses alive, and there's a fucking bill trying to get passed in the U.S. that would make it illegal for women to get abortions without male…
this. hes so likable !!
The wanton discrimination against men continues unabated.Shall it ever end?
#NeverForgetPrinceHarrysButt
I mean, maybe, we don't have to completely forget about his butt.
all the lack of LGBT representation means is that they weren't represented by the main characters, and even then unless the story delves into their sexuality as it does with Harry, you CAN'T know for certain there were none— you can only say we don't have an example from the slim margin of time we interact with…
I see you are also a visionary.
Ted Bundy. ENOUGH SAID.
i personally have an extreme apathy towards the issue of celebrity (part of the reason i am doing this feature currently is to see if i can make it interesting for myself) but i have an even GREATER apathy for males who believe girls are concerned about what they think
It also reeks of "I'M SO SMART, I DON'T NEED A LAWYER, I CAN DO THIS MYSELF"
Did the woman provide written consent for the man to ejaculate in the first place?