It says the suspect was from Troy, Michigan which is located in the Suburbs outside of Detroit. That's about 25 miles outside of the borders of Detroit.

I've sat in an E92 335 backseat and I wasn't impressed. But I've never been impressed sitting in the back of any 2+2 coupe.

Well if Cadillac doesn't want him, there's always Lincoln........

Exactly why I said "Kei" car. It looks like a "Kei" car even if it's not technically one. And it didn't sell.

Thank the heavens. Nissan brought the wrong "Kei" car over.

As someone who started working downtown about three months before the City of Detroit declared bankruptcy, I have the same feeling that you do Aaron. While I don't live within the borders of Detroit, I'm starting to see new development pop up everywhere along Woodward and that's been great to see.

Although I'm not…

And the WRX is better performing and cheaper than the Lancer Ralliart. Mitsu had a pretty good concept with the latest Ralliart by really making it a "baby evo" but unfortunately executed it poorly and the car just wasn't as great as it could have been.

Go home missile, you're drunk.... Er, on second thought don't go home....

Which is why I'm holding on to my '11 WRX 5dr for the time being.

I'm referring to the back seat of the M4 or your standard 4 series now. The back seat of any 2+2 coupe isn't exactly designed for carrying 4 full size adults comfortably. So what's the point of having that back seat?

Yeah I wasn't even commenting about reliability. But more for the fact that the M3 (or M4 now) is a traditional 2+2 with a "trunk" vs the Vette being a 2 seat only vehicle. But I've seen how much can fit in the back of a Vette and it's surprising.

Unless you're a BMW enthusiast which there's nothing wrong with, or you feel compelled to have a car with a mostly useless back seat, or in most cases you want a more refined and more suited daily driver, then the BMW M4/M3 is your car.

I don't remember the Pontiac Montana SV6 ever being promoted as an "off road vehicle". I thought that title went to the Pontiac Aztec which is also FWD and wasn't much of an off road capable vehicle either. Despite being practical in other areas.

Without RWD or AWD (my preference), I can't wait to see these things get stuck in a puddle. At least a Jeep Renegade or a Subaru XV Crosstrek will have better off road capability than this will.

I'm still searching for that clean low mileage 06 Impulse Blue Metallic GTO with the blue interior. Surprisingly low mileage LS2s are holding steady in the low to mid 30k range.

Oh and I want mine with the 17"s and not 18"s because I don't want to have to replace the suspension which they are known to not hold up well…

I challenge someone to find a GXP version of the Solstice Coupe for sale. I've been searching for months and have only seen non-GXP versions for sale.

And I'm one of those late 20yr old nostalgic Japanese car enthusiasts that can finally afford some of these. I still haven't found the right one.

I don't see there being strong enough of a case for bringing the RS stateside but I would certainly welcome it. Figured it would stay FWD which isn't my cup of tea, but the last RS seemed to manage pretty well with it. It's still a bad ass car even without AWD, but that would have been cool to make it an STI and Golf…

If GM really wants to out-do Ford, they should look into stuffing the twin turbo 3.6L V6 under the new Alpha platform Camaro and then drop the LT1 in it and make it only a few ponies less than what's in the C7 Corvette.

Ditto. They just don't understand, do they? I'm still waiting for the sticker shock to come in when the V60 Polestar price gets released because I think it's going to end up costing more than I think it will unfortunately.