Malcire
Malcire
Malcire

Bill can probably give them a recipe to help with that. I just wonder how they say things like this one did with a straight face.

Sounds like it.

Kind of embarrassing, but I'm not really all that comfortable with twitter. I'll take your word for it.

What white supremacy, that she benefits from I mean (I would hope the racist tweets would be more of a hindrance for her)? I get the white privilege.

Thanks. I don't follow her or use twitter much so I was wondering why people were saying that.

Is Iggy a white supremacist (not really familiar with either of them).

Not her fault, true. But it definitely is her problem (as in career wise it hurts her).

Drake was already an actor though, and I thought he used his connections to get play on that tape.

Not that that Iggy is more talented (I have no idea on that). But she is more established. Mix tapes and small release aren't going to do shit to get to the top. And starting feuds with established artists and the industry is just going to make sure no one is going to want to sign her.

*claps hands happily and jumps up and down* :P

Oh. My bad. This one "Oh yeah, if there is plenty of room and it's a fairly empty car, by all means - spread out and get comfortable! But otherwise, I guess maybe I figure it's just common decency to spare a little personal comfort for the comfort of others.". I meant it is common decency to give up a small about of

Well. I suppose if German was your first language that could explain your failure to understand me picking a the part of the article I disagreed with as opposed to the whole thing.

It isn't.

Love the name. Wish I could star you more.

That looks like it could lead to some back pain.

The insurance is probably to protect against say the film (or files) being lost or for some other reason not being able to release it, at least that's probably what the intention of the insurer is. If they release it on DVD it would probably also keep them from claiming the insurance. And the reviews I've seen say it

You must have missed the point where she is comparing a threat against a single person to be the same as the threat against a group of people. I never said that the Rogers or the threat to shoot up a speaking engagement from Sarkesian weren't terrorism. Both met the criteria I stated were required didn't they? So it

They probably insured the film (a commenter on another article pointed out) against loss. Apparently it's common for the insurance to only pay out for a full loss. So if they released it but it didn't earn back it's cost (say because no theater would show it due to threats) they would be stuck with the tab. By not

Yeah. Except no. Threatening an individual generally doesn't get referred to as terrorism. Hence why these hackers get called terrorists once they start threatening something comparable to say mass killings. Terrorists also tend to (but don't have to) have goals such as forcing a group of people (like a country) to

Thank you very much.