Yeah man, I think that's the big discrepancy we're having, tbh.

That's cool. I highly recommend Origins. There are all sorts of things which were always kinda weirdly broken in the old games that they never fixed. Things I didn't even think about fixing.

Yeah, that is weird!

Pressing the crouch button? Eh? I think we're talking about different things!

Sorry if I'm bragging. I'm just trying to explain that I'm not another uneducated guy hating on you from the internet. I also don't care if you feel sorry for me at all- I feel fine with myself- this is just trying to keep it clear where I stand and why I'm saying all this.

Go for City for now dude, you'll save money because Origins will be cheaper in the month or two that you decide to go get it.

Punctuation doesn't matter ;)

Oh, and I'd say Origins is better than City by far too :) to me, Origins feels like the potential in City, realised. I'd say do it as per release- Asylum, City, Origins.

You should definitely play Arkham Asylum first dude. It's the best game out of all of them (as much as I'm LOVING Origins), and it the perfect introduction.

You have to hold the Grapnel button to hang onto edges. They changed it so that you automatically vault over, but have to hold the button to hang on. It's better this way, imho. The game tells you that early on.

I'm playing away atm - Origins is fantastic, I prefer it to City - but mate, we all know that there will be another Arkham game from Rocksteady. It's as sure as Naughty Dog making another Uncharted.

Can I just say that, to me, this feels like the game Arkham City should have been?

Can I just say that, to me, this feels like the game Arkham City should have been?

Can I just say that, to me, this feels like the game Arkham City should have been?

Asyum is the perfect introduction and it's very cheap and very short. Hit it up.

I understand your sentiment- and stillettos said what needed to be said.

This game feels to me like what Arkham City should have been. I absolutely love it. Far more immersed, enjoying it a lot more than City.

So making mistakes or reducing use of colonial English protocol is the behaviour of a "retard"? Whoa there, offensive attitude to take from a teacher. Would you call your students who make mistakes retards?

You can't possibly compare using hate speech or disparaging terms with not using capital letters.

Thanks for the sensible reply man.