Yeah I suppose that's a true thing. I reckon if they did it right, it would work brilliantly, probably better than the Souls series. But they probably won't.

I totally dig the focus on duels. I think that's a great idea. Combat systems generally suffer from a bad balance of enemies, but having it 1 on 1 should allow them to get the few onscreen enemies to have the best AI possible, which should make fights a lot better.

I generally agree with you, but I think the destruction mechanic could prove pretty interesting. Along with the collection of powers you'll accrue over the game.

My girlfriend's getting that right now, with Bioshock Infinite. It's majestic to behold.

Never, ever, EVER, dude.

The fake blood was shit.

CoD 1-4 are decent games, don't knock the whole series based on MW2 onwards (the multi-million selling ones). CoD: 1-2 are especially great. But yeah, everything after Modern Warfare is seriously, seriously derivative and weak. This looks so dull and done to death it's unbelievable. Literally nothing here we haven't…

Really? Man, I never got that. It wasn't busy and epic light it felt in the books, but like most stuff in the show, I felt that this was more real. The Kings Landing weddings have all been mad bustle and of huge size, which is fitting, but the Frey's is a claustrophobic, limited place. I thought the filmed the scene…

Yeah man, cool of you to reply in such a cool manner.

That's interesting. I still don't think either the books or the TV show are that great, but I think the TV show is much better at being a piece of entertainment. I do feel largely apathetic about both, though; after having read the first 4 texts in the series before getting very fucking tired of their shit. I think…

Weird reply from beyond the grave- but yes, The Last Of Us is a work in zombie fiction about this exact thing making a freak jump to mankind and ruining us. And it's apparently a masterpiece, "the Citizen Kane of videogames" one review called it. The writing and acting are supposedly sublime. Check it out.

"Ive been trying for years to get used to it and I simply cant. Whats so hard to understand about it? I get frustrated with them and am simply too used to my mouse."

Of course it wouldn't intrigue you into giving it another shot- it would more likely deflate your interest further to see characters you have to watch for twenty hours get killed off!

It's definitely not the entire cast, don't worry mate. But of, say, the primary 7-9 characters, it's about three or four of them that go. I won't give an exact number so you can't tell if you do decide to watch it.

Pretty sure the scene will have no impact whatsoever if you haven't been following it for at least a season or two. The reason it's so powerful is that Robb and Talisa have been built up for so long as having quite a bit of fortune and being an almost idyllic couple. Although times are tough, they're managing, and…

Yeah, I suppose one negative of giving perks based on completing combos is that you have to complete the combo to get the perk.

I'd say ignore Gamezwhatever.

If you imagine that ND probably spent almost all of the three-year period developing The Last Of Us constantly tweaking the controls- and consider for a moment that the things you are complaining about are probably deliberate- it's easy to see why.

That's a good point, but standing still will definitely still be better for you than sitting, by orders of magnitude. While standing, hundreds of our muscles are still taut and exercising to keep ourselves upright. You don't break a sweat, but it's legitimate exercise which attains muscle tone. Sitting still,…

Apparently it is just like the Arkham games.