I took my TDI in to a local VW dealer to see if they would indeed honor “full pre scandal trade in values.”
I don’t like cambered or stanced looks but by god I’m happy it exists!
This is why we can’t have nice, diesel-powered stick shift things. At least I now understand why we never got that Mazda 6 diesel here. Or Forester. Or...
Guns.
I think the answer is a resounding no, strictly on the basis that the psychological wounds are still as ominpresent and destructive as they’ve ever been.
Are they taking TDIs in trade? I’d get a new GTI if that was the case.
Why bring back the Aerobus and make a pickup? I like the old sedan, but who’s clamoring for a Checker pickup and Limo? There must be some exemption based on gross vehicle weight or something here.
Digging through the chassis pictures however... it seems a bit um, light on structure compared to the FF Roadster:
Aesthetically this makes the F5 look pedantic. The F5 counters with a badass custom mid-engine chassis of course but on looks the Catfish is slaying.
It’s all relative, right?
I thought they were too, and I wanted to try an optical cable on this new TV I had just purchased connecting to a stereo... cable turned out to be defective anyway! SO I had to return it (found another on the south side on King drive) and ordered one from Amazon.
This.
*le sigh*
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Apparently this isn’t a pickup truck because of its unibody construction. Or so some fanboys of the internet universe would like me to believe...
Do you work for FCA or are you just a fanboy? I have W2s from FCA.
I think you’re just spouting personal belief here, there’s no agreement outside of your own views that says one way or another.
According to whom? Consumers or manufacturers? Because companies are seldom all manner of products they call SUVs that aren’t body-on-frame.
I own one.