[...]

Sometimes I see these posts and think "oh man, someone must've had to hit a deadline," and then I see how much insipid discussion the author participates in and realize the whole scenario is somehow dumber than I thought.

I think it's more about the headline than the content here.

Raysism clearly doesn't get it.

Raysism clearly doesn't get it.
He is Wile E Coyote running into the rock with a tunnel isometrically painted onto it.

I'm impressed.

Brutal.

Good lord, I think I've heard more people use that Tolstoy quote than have likely read Anna Karenina.

Subversive lol.

Now I'm not "new" here; I just don't participate. I guess your habit of spouting half-memes and posting pictures without anything valuable to say has lent to your lack of literacy as well? Some community you fancy yourself as being a gatekeeper of, truncated of any ingenuity and relevance.

Reddit in a nutshell.

I rarely find myself participating or browsing around here, but...
Does this constitute as a response on Kotaku? An all-caps non-contribution and a non-sequitur picture that clearly has less to do with anything?

How long has this been weighing on him that he's tweeting it now, in July?

Okay.

Warning: boring poster commenting on a clip being "insightful" on a sub-site entited "Foodspin" is on the wrong fucking site for insight.

I hate pretending like just reposting a video or picture constitutes as a worthwhile response, but Paul F Tompkins' little rant here more than validates itself as a response to the underlying "moral" angle mentioned here:

I worked at a library and, in my free time, decided to give graphic novels a shot. I probably read around two dozen of the big name ones and was sufficiently surprised at how good some of them were—especially in a way that made really effective use of the medium—but after gorging myself, I found I had no overwhelming…

...so you just read the headlines and the comments?

A swing and a miss.