That doesn’t excuse her spitting in the face of the relatives of all those who died in the 80's. The Reagans greately contributed to that and shouldnt be celebrated for it.

That doesn’t mean you lie about people and say those who did great damage actually helped. That’s an insult to all who died of AIDS in the 80's and their relatives who lost them. So, that insensitivity and spoken untruth lies squarely on Hillary’s shoulders.

That movie was made over 30 years ago, and Black members of the audiece were unhappy with that then. This isn’t just a remake, so there was no reason for the film to reflect the advances our society has made in racial sensitivity and make one of the White women the MTA worker and the Black woan a scientist.

They’re still scientists, and all white women, while the black woman is the loud MTA worker. With three White women, they could have easily made the Black woman a scientist as well.

You completely missed the point of the legitimate complaints. There’s nothing wrong with having an MTA worker, but it was ridiculous for them to make the one Black woman one instead of one of the three White women. It’s the equivalent of having a movie of four Black friends, three being professional men, with the one…

Slave Tetris is bad because it’s horrific and racist to make entertainment out of “stacking” bug-eyed Black people into slave ships, sometimes bending their bodies in the process. It’s the equivalent of having Gas chamber Tetris and moving Jews in the concentration camps into gas chambers.

That was another rant failing to actually address my points or address your clear bias in your statements. You've now reduced yourself to irrelevant bad math and chuckles to make your "points." So, to end this, I will just summarize the proof of your gamergate-hood.

Edit #2: Substitute "anything" for everything in second to last paragraph.

Edit: replace "suppose" with "support" in the first line.

Firstly, I never said you couldn't suppose both sides (your poor reading again). I said you don't; you definitely support the gamergate side more. Here is some of the proof:

My responses to your explanations of your gamergate-friendly quotes:

You didn't answer my question. You didn't show that gamergaters will be happy with SJW involvement. You said they would be happy if they keep to the role gamergaters would be happy they took. Big difference. So, Waltfeld's assertion that gamergaters will "get what they want" is still incorrect. People caring…

"I correctly said there isn't an anti-gamergate side.

1. Firstly, I don't work for Kotaku. Secondly, you don't specify what exactly would satisfy gamergate as a whole—we'll assume you don't know. However, you do acknowledge gamergaters as a whole would not be satisfied by what satisfies you. So, we can move on.

No, the help they need is actual psychiatric help. Feeding and encouraging their psychotic and hateful delusions isn't helping them; it's feeding and encouraging their psychotic and hateful delusions.

"I correctly said there isn't an anti-gamergate side.

Firstly, I did not say there are "independent groups;" I correctly said there isn't an anti-gamergate side. Remember what I said about reading fast as opposed to reading well. And yes, you are reluctant to criticize gamergate; you have refused to do so in three straight post; that is clearly reluctance. Your…

Spaces cultivating and fomenting hate speech like misogyystic (not just sexist) speech are not "safe" spaces. They are legal spaces fomenting hate speech that inevitably fosters and/or produces hateful action. If men want or need (for some reason) a space to complain about women, fine. However, hateful speech (with…

First of all, I've already established there are not two "sides." There are gamergaters/gamergate supporters and there are people opposed to misogynistic harassment of women gamergate deems their enemies. That's not an official "anti-gamergate" organization. If gamergate actually only pursued their nebulous…

Edit: the final sentence in the third paragraph below should read: