Jerykk
Jerykk
Jerykk

If you’re buying the games, you’re kind of missing the point of the subscription service. I didn’t buy any Ubisoft games in 2023 so if I paid $18, I’d be able to play The Crew: Motorfest, AC: Mirage, Avatar and the new PoP. That’s a pretty good deal. Subbing for an entire year would be a waste of money. It makes way

People really need to read the actual article before getting angry. Here’s what the Ubisoft rep specifically said:

Now playing

My interest in these remasters just increased tenfold. TR’s camera and controls were crap back in ‘96 so fixing those will already be a huge improvement. Everything else is just icing on the cake.

Not sure why you were surprised by that. AW2 came out in late October, less than a month away from Black Friday. Of course it was going to be discounted.

I feel like you haven’t played any 3D games in 20 years. Off the top of my head, the last game where I fell through the floor was Morrowind back in 2002.

Yeah, once Steam became popular, physical copies were even more redundant. You were lucky to even get a disc with the actual game on it.

Have you read the actual article? The Ubisoft rep explicitly states that the company still views purchasing games as an important option for consumers. They just believe that subscriptions are an equally valid option for many consumers and that this group will grow over time.

You should probably read the article in question. Nowhere does the developer say that Ubisoft will stop selling games and force you to use subscription services.

I doubt you genuinely believe that PC prices are going to grow exponentially higher in 5 years. I’m assuming you know what “exponentially” actually means, though.

Jedi Survivor is the only game left with performance issues in certain areas (unless you have a top end CPU). All the other ports have since been fixed. Jedi Survivor also had technical issues on consoles. Same goes for Redfall, Forspoken and Wild Hearts.

Figured as much. So Ubisoft’s decision to include DLC with the subscription is a double edged sword, really. On the one hand, getting all the DLC is great. On the other hand, it means that if you want to eventually buy the game, you’ll have to buy all of the DLC too.

Common sense? Live service games consistently have the highest player counts on Steam, PSN, XBL, etc. As such, it stands to reason that more people play live service games than traditional single-player games (which is why publishers are pushing live service games). Statistically, the chances of any AAA studio not

How does that work with games that have DLC? Ubisoft+ includes all the DLC for each game so if you make a save while playing the DLC content, then later try to load that save with a purchased copy that doesn’t have the DLC, what happens?

Yeah, subscriptions aren’t ideal for big games since you’ll always feel like you’re under a time limit to finish them. That’s not a problem for smaller games, though. Games are available on subscription services for at least a year, which is more than enough time to finish a 5-20 hour game.

Oh, I’m well aware that WB is chasing the live service dream. However, that’s not mutually exclusive with Rocksteady wanting to make a co-op loot shooter. Both things can be true.

You act like rising hardware requirements are something new. They’ve always been a thing. Granted, GPU prices have gotten pretty ridiculous but you don’t need a $1000+ GPU to get good image quality and performance, especially with new tech like DLSS/FSR and frame generation.

That’s a fair point, though it’s not an issue inherent to digital distribution. It’s an issue with console makers wanting to eliminate competition and keep all their consumers in walled gardens. Given the recent antitrust ruling against Google, it’s conceivable that if consoles went all digital, they’d be forced to

The decline of “goodies” started long before PC went all digital. Big boxes, thick manuals, etc, were all costs that started getting cut in the late 90's as PC’s retail presence rapidly declined. By the end of PC’s physical era, you were just getting a disc in a cheap plastic case with an extremely barebones manual

I’m tempted to do that myself. I’m interested in the new PoP and mildly interested in the new Avatar game, so spending $18 to finish PoP and put some good hours into Avatar seems like a good deal.

Future? Digital has been a thing for almost twenty years at this point and PC has been all-digital for well over a decade. It’s been pretty great, actually. The PC game market has never been stronger and there are a ton of games that simply wouldn’t exist if games were still chained to retail.