I am quasi- because when you get into specifics of AnCap with a Socialist, they just call you names, and exit the debate.

Because Socialized ideologies are already lost, in that they believe there is an inherent entitlement to force others to act [or not act] the way they think they ought. They excuse it because it is…

Ends do not justify Means. You don't have a right to police thought or tell others how to live, any more than they do to do the same to you.

And as I said, there are better, easier ways to solve those problems that do not involve enabling Tyranny and growing the State.

But those ways do not enable Thought Police, or…

It may be awful, but Ends do not justify Means.

There are better ways to solve problems than enabling Tyranny.

I think it's distasteful when people make laws that can forcibly compel me to do things, as a means of solving a problem.

But I think this argument is about to get circular real quick.

If you don't violate my sovereignty as an individual and try to tell me how to live my life, what to buy, who to sell to, who to…

But often times, those who oppose the present political agenda - but may not oppose the people - get accused of wanting to treat people as a "second-class" citizen.

There are other solutions to solve society's problems than creating more special classes and more laws.

In fact, easier ones...

But I know we're not likely…

I have friends of all political strains, we just don't agree on politics. I have atheist, christian, pagan friends, hell, I know people from just about every religion.

I know both Anarchists and Socialists. I know a few Marxists, too, but we're not as close because we are too much polar opposite to really have much in…

Yeah, trying to turn me on myself isn't going to work, either. You a Psych major or something?

I'm not angry. But I am proving a point. You followed me and trolled my other posts. I said turnabout is fair play. It is.

I try, oh, I try. And then the cries of 'Neckbeard' come, the ad hominem flows, and I run out of fucks to give about civil discourse.

Game company making a game that has caught ire of the SJW Outrage Machine refuses to give flamebait to reporter working for SJW Outrage Machine Blog which has a history of persecuting 'offending' creatives by using caught-off-guard statements overblown with tactics that would make a tabloid seem like the NYT.

News is…

No, only rude people wear hats indoors.

And as to memes - I was speaking to my audience.

Turnabout is fair play.

Better arguments than "Other people disliked this, so I and you should dislike this".

It can be taught!

Argumentum ad populum against an Individualist:

*they're

#Corrections

Oh, yes. Because wanting fair courts and rape laws that don't infantilize women and persecute men is so HATEFUL.

Exactly. Now wouldn't you rather that people just make art from their own experience, instead of being subject to a fickle mob's over-sensitivities, proclivities, and outrages, [in the name of, ironically, making themselves look "better" by supposedly appealing to you] and that instead someone who shared your life…

You made a back-handed assertion that you being a woman somehow would mean I'd look down on you.

"Oh, yeah, and I'm a woman."

Which is the equivalent of "Yes, I like gaemz. AND OH YEAH I AM A WOMAN. DEAL WITH IT."

*Insert half-naked selfie pose with controllers for underwear and un-ironic schoolgirl smile while biting…

I would welcome such an honor, but your false assumptions are laughter-inducing.

Play Demon's Souls. In a lot of ways, the Dark Souls games took it down a notch in difficulty and complexity.

This is supposed to be a sequel to Demon's Souls, since Dark Souls was basically From Software nanny-sissing about their contract that all Demon's Souls property would be PS platform exclusive. It was a way…

Not until there's at least a $75.00 price drop, the games are already out, and they turn out to be good.