Pandering to the insecure and the self-victimized.

I'm betting Pheromones and nonverbal cues, rather than luck.

Back-handedness won't get you far in discussions with me.

I think that's Kotaku's new subtitle/motto, and the subtitle of pretty much all of Patricia's articles....

No. That's a pretty big misconception. Anyone who has been a Leader at any point in their lives - and wasn't a tyrannical dipshit, because if they were, unless they were part of an incompetent organization, they wouldn't last long - knows that it means leading from the front and earning and deserving the respect of…

But you still back-handedly supported his assertion based on what you admit is an unfounded assumption.

Not to mention the underlying skewed perspective.

Any anyone who can reason worth a damn knows that is a flimsy pretense, because correlation != causation.

Just gonna leave this here.

I should write in as a To Love RU character but adapt the story to be realistic, and see how he responds.

I didn't say he was a stupid person. I said I disliked the combination, albeit in a perhaps dismissive manner.

But I didn't say he had bad character, or that his opinions were bunk, or that he lived in a basement, did I?

You're right that everyone discriminates - so I wish we would all just stop pretending. The…

Isn't that an Ero-Game?

Is it incorrect to term a female of a species as female?

Oh, wait. You're going to open the Genderqueer can of worms, aren't you?

Have I marred science by using science?

Fuck you.

No, people are making unfounded, stereotypical assertions about me based on a hat that I happen to like, and then discriminating against me and the validity of my opinions further based on said assertions.

Oh, I see.

So it's only discrimination when it's a popular victim group, not that discrimination is a concept in and of itself.

Nothing to see here.

It has always been so - the Xbox was built on Shooterbros....

He's a SJW/WK who feels bad about his sexuality. So he feels like he has to preface his interest in a female by dissuading what he thinks are extant Feminist arguments against him, to prove he's 'not like that'.

Diversity for its own sake should be insulting to anyone it would represent.

But that would require personal responsibility and not posting easy clickbait and stirring up controversy. WHAT WOULD GARME JOURNALIZM BE WITHOUT THAT?!?

They do that to me, too.

I try in vain to engage and be genuine, and all they do is pile on the ad-hominem.