She does admit it quite clearly - one sentence after the one you quoted:

Clearly an intentional stylistic choice, one that works very well in my opinion. By the time you're out of high school, you should be able to accept that some of the "rules" you learned about writing in 8th grade are negotiable.

I actually would rather have it after it was destroyed. I am certain I will never in my life buy a traditional wedding dress, but that one splattered in paint is now a really interesting work of art that I find very appealing.

I didn't know she existed until just now.

I would like this better if there weren't a video, proving that he was in fact going for the viral internet thing. Just the four photos would have been much nicer.

The "maybe" option on Facebook actually makes sense if you use it right. You can get notifications for updates about the event, just as if you had RSVP'd "yes," so it stays on your radar until you can give a definite answer. Of course, the "maybe" should be updated to a yes or no as the event approaches.

I'm not criticizing the fact that they are reporting on it; I want them to report on scientific findings more often and more thoroughly. You can't have been reading Jezebel very long if you think this website is consistent in how they present scientific findings.

Well, sometimes they also dislike it when a study paints women in a light that many might see as positive - such as, women are more nurturing or something - but that doesn't fit the narrative Jezebel wants to push. This particular one really could have gone either way, I think, depending on which author had…

Yeah, I think I know the one you mean.

I find it so weird how Jezebel reports on these sorts of studies. If a study points to there being some kind of difference between men and women, half the time Jezebel will be all skeptical and suggest the study must be using sexist methodology or working from sexist assumptions. But then sometimes, they will…

The first season really bothered me too. I hated that Leslie was so desperate romantically and unable to see that what's-his-face just wasn't into her. I hated that she was portrayed as delusional and naive in her aspirations to improve the town. It was cynical and mean-spirited, in my opinion. The tone shift…

OK, cool if someone got it. At least one other person also seems to have thought she was being serious though, so I wasn't alone. And I still think she was being inaccurate/misleading with her claims about birth control, which perhaps led me more towards thinking she was serious about other misguided notions.

Or maybe you're not very good at being sarcastic? Most people on here who make sarcastic statements don't go on to support their statements with earnest-seeming arguments.

Your original claim was that abstinence education is the solution, because birth control fails incredibly often despite near universal use. That is just wrong and misleading on so many levels. When birth control is used correctly, it is overwhelmingly effective. The problem is that sex ed for many young women is…

Also, the next bullet point on that list reads: "Modern contraception is highly effective. Among American women at risk for unintended pregnancy, the 65% who use a contraceptive method consistently and correctly account for only 5% of unintended pregnancies."

"at some point used a contraceptive method" could mean that they once used a condom. That does not mean that 99% of women are on the pill.

"almost all American women use birth control." Source please.

Were they just blatantly speaking like that in front of her? Or were they speaking Spanish or something thinking she couldn't understand?

I agree with you that the people telling you to read the book are being annoying and stupid.

Maybe a lot of them went to Hollywood as aspiring actors, and just started the bodyguard thing as a side job.