The source article from the Atlantic gives that info. The effect is pretty equivalent for both genders.

This stuff actually can be controversial. There is a long history of scientists ignoring what women self-report about their sexual experiences and telling them that they're just wrong. This goes back as far as Freud's claims that there is something pathological about a woman who orgasms from clitoral stimulation…

OK. Sorry I implied ignorance on your part that couldn't really be accurately inferred from your comment.

I think it's a bit more controversial than you realize to say that boobs are "inherently not for sexual use." Obviously their primary purpose is nursing, but organs are not always single-purpose. Many women report that breast/nipple stimulation can cause them to be aroused in much the same way as clitoral…

"(This story literally never gets less depressing, does it?)"

Yeah, I got that too. But the pic BrianD posted below works in Google Images, and you can get a name easily from there.

I don't really consider it doxxing to reveal the name of someone who fervently claims to be a public figure. It's not like I want to find his address or contact details. I just wanted to verify how much of a nobody he is.

Thanks, that got me to the answer.

Yup, that's what I was just concluding.

It looks like a few people on Reddit managed to identify him, but their comments were deleted on account of the strict anti-doxxing rules over there. But yeah, he's clearly not a household name.

Here's his picture from Reddit, less blacked out. Can anyone identify?

I'm so sorry those crazy rich people kicked and bit you.

Gawker has a whole post devoted to this phenomenon: http://gawker.com/here-are-some-…

Except that when you Google "boo," you mostly get results about a dog named Boo. That damned racist Pomeranian.

The funny thing about Global's annoying reply to you is that the answer actually cannot be found anywhere on the first page of Google results. Even if you scroll all the way through the Urban Dictionary page for "boo," there is nothing about race.

Seriously. If you don't actually give a shit about the people who are getting married and you don't think they value having you there, don't attend the wedding.

Seriously, this article is the equivalent of an obnoxious commenter saying, "I can't believe Jezebel is posting about nail polish when people are dying in ___ right now."

I don't think it's that big of a deal either way. You're not lying if you decide to start the story a little later, but lots of couples have that kind of non-linear story. What exactly are you worried that your relatives will think if you tell them the truth?

Did he ever actually find the Slutty Pumpkin? I didn't watch all of them in later seasons.