Give a yell when you come to Las Vegas....

ummmm...

So how are you impacted if you don't log on to a vulnerable site directly, but instead log in through facebook or google like Kinja does?

Where can I buy a mouse costume and a plane ticket to Edinburgh?

Are there any post-mortem shots? THAT would make for a good mystery.....

But are they delicious when you salt them?

That comment stings.....

Not really. One should assume that the words mean what they mean. We can't function as a society if we all have different rules for how grammar works.

That is still to my point. It is not damaging that it is on twitter. The problem is that social media is being used for news. Whether it is used by people or a software aggregate is irrelevant.

Just make it in another country and show us here...

"Breaking news on Twitter that turns out to be false or simply doesn't have the proper context can do real damage."

I would have gone Dead Sea Scrolls at around year 50.....

Because Velcro tape is too difficult.

In preparation of parenthood, I have been considering names and I have narrowed the list to:

It would be news if Katy Perry smiled and looked like Morgan Freeman, but frowned and looked like Kate Mulgrew. The premise for this article is that Katy Perry tends to look like Katy Perry over time. That is what us "learn-ed folk" call "a given."

Dissimilar means not similar. Therefore "not dissimilar" means not not similar. The double negative cancels out leaving just "similar."

Yes, but in the article they use both terms. The obfuscating one is used at the beginning before all of the caveats that many will not bother reading down to see. Those people will interpret the terms to be equivalent. Then the panic mongering media will misquote and draw a conclusion that they are in fact so similar…

"not dissimilar"

"A three hour tour, a three hour tour."

So....people tend to look like themselves.