GallifreyGirl
GallifreyGirl
GallifreyGirl

Personally, I thought it was cool in its ambitions, but pretty terrible in its execution. It turns out that pushing the boundaries of what your show can do by writing a musical episode isn't as awesome as you might imagine if you only have three cast members who can sing and they're all supporting players. I can't

That's what I love about Buffy and Angel - no matter how much I don't like an episode, there's always something in it I love.

Seasons 3 and 4 were largely pretty great. Like most Trek shows, it found its footing after the second year.

If you don't intend to do a rape scene, don't do the fraking rape scene. You certainly don't deploy the director, the writer, the producers, the actor who played the rapist and George RR Martin (and Lena Heady conspicuous by her absence) to do a full court press man-splain of how everyone just needs to calm the fuck

At the end of that episode they need to have Jay and Kay show up.

Now playing

But "She" gave us the most horrible dancing, courtesy of Angel and Wesley... it's a wonderful way to explain awkward celebrations years later in .gif form. (The clapping dance always gets me, though.)

It was a badly handled scene, that's for sure. I think the intent was to show just how toxic that relationship had become. I honestly don't think they intended it as rape, but that's how it comes across anyway, which unfortunately wrecks Jaime's character development rather than conveying what I think the scene

I get that, but I think those who are troubled by the scene forget that it's meant to establish that both Jamie and Cersi are bad people. The most common response the next day on Twitter was "How could they do that? That's horrible!" ...forgetting that we're talking about the villains, here. We're talking about the

And we will never speak of this again, under penalty of torture.

You forgot Love and Monsters, though I wouldn't blame you considering it's the worst episode of Doctor Who ever made. And it's not just because of its downright offensive ending, but that is a major factor.

#3 Angel - Eternity

Now playing

Woah woah woah, that gave us an expression that still holds up today, and more importantly this:

A lot of what's wrong with Moffat's Who is a result of there being no rules whatsoever as to what time travel can and can't do in his universe, so there's no problem that can't be deus-ex-machina'd away by it. RTD was far from perfect in this regard, but "Father's Day" was at least a reasonable attempt to establish

But the whole plot of this actually quite wonderful episode depends on the idea that if you cross your own timeline, huge time vultures will appear and eat everybody.

One time my cat ran away. Turned out she was just in the wall right next to my apartment. Wish I'd known that before spending every single waking moment of the 5 days she was "gone" running around in -20°F weather, leaving cat food next sources of heat, tracking every set of paw prints I could find, putting up posters

No, no, they're hoarders. They might be rich hoarders, but they're hoarders. No sane, responsible person running a cat rescue would have that many cats at once, and then try to ship them to another country. These people are not normal.

Jeffrey and Shoshanna sound insufferable. Cotton found a way out, hoping for the life of a coddled only cat, rather than being one of 31. Be free, Cotton.

I'm pretty sure when a hotel advertises themselves as "pet-friendly," seventeen cats is not what they had in mind.

I like sunny side up eggs with my egg 'n chips (British thing, too, I guess: fried eggs with chunky fries, whereby you dip your fries into the soft egg yolk) but not as translucent (read: uncooked) as the ones pictured :D

You mean those things in the back that look like scones?