FreudianNipSlip
FreudianNipSlip
FreudianNipSlip

"Sorry, Whovians, but I think I'll stay at a safe distance for now."

Noooooooo. Nyope. Nope. No. This is the highest level of eloquence I can reach when faced with such a disastrous sentiment.

I also do not see it as an improvement. I have found it SHOCKING (and yet, reflective of the new category and its definition) the way people have mixed up gender/sex on this list serv which is made up of 100% APA psychologists interested in LGBTQIA issues. Many are patting themselves on the back for being such great

I will admit, I am slightly thrown by the Kinja format. I tried to make sure this wasn't a repeat question - if it is, please disregard it then. However, I was wondering what your thoughts might be on the new DSM-5 category of "gender dysphoria", as a replacement for "gender identity disorder." Supposedly, this new

I have not noticed, apparently I am missing all the juicy intra-gawker gossip! Clearly this will need to be amended...

Rich and Nick spill rightttttt about here: http://gawker.com/5983927/im-not-straight-but-my-boyfriend-is

Here: http://gawker.com/5983927/im-not-straight-but-my-boyfriend-is

Thanks, I meant to include this link in my original post but alas, forgot to copy/paste.

I had to look up what this was referencing and....woah. Especially with Nick Denton commenting on Rich's account, what a mess (and yet, I completely missed it!)

I don't know, just because a woman has power doesn't means she's behaving in a way one would classify as feminist (ex, Palin or Bachman). And the aunt was killing the woman because she had been abandoned by her husband - so now she kills young, unmarried women? I'm not convinced....maybe if she had lured men to their

Hausu is a feminist revenge story? I mayyyyy have missed that part...what with all the mutilation and piano-monster and such.

IT'S EXACTLY WHAT SHE WANTED!

Rodents Offering Unyielding Support?

Doug, you're gonna want to spell check from now on...although this is a dark and turbulent moment for Smith, I don't believe it has incited a "SITH" Q&A.

It's drivel, not dribble....

I fit my comment around this gif, and not the other way around - like the true internet commentariat.

Exactly the reason I said "this issue" - because I still think we need to hold their feet to the fire re: their racism, classism, sexism...all the isms that for some reason politicians feel the need to espouse and hold so, so dear. I'm tempted to not even use the term "step" in the right direction, as it's far too

I'm shocked, but in a good way! They've needed to align their over-arching "small government" rhetoric with their social policies for a long time - glad to see it's happening on this issue.

The "cage and cubicle dweller" living-situation referenced above was new to me (and possibly some other people), so I looked into a little and...wow. Horrifying. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2084971/Hong-Kongs-cage-homes-Tens-thousands-living-6ft-2ft-rabbit-hutches.html

Oh god, his entire blog is....just amazing. My favorite post is where he argues that only people who "benefit society" should vote - "If someone is poor and needs government aid, I’m not saying suspend it by any means. I’m saying that until they get back on their feet, they won’t be allowed to vote."