Still would be subject to Federal tax.

This is not really true. It’s not tax exempt, you just pay the taxes on the income as it comes out of the account when you are retired as opposed to paying tax on the income up front as it goes into the account. The purpose is to have the benefit of the full amount of principal to grow income before the tax is taken…

That is a moronic argument. Avengers went from $81M to $18m friday to monday (78%), Age of Ultron went from $84M to $13M (85%). You clearly don’t have a clue what you are talking about.

1. It was Easter Sunday.

This would seem to contradict that notion:

Drew has addressed almost this exact question in the funbag. See the question from “Jeff” here:

I’m with you! I own a copy on DVD I purchased from a Blockbuster for $2 when they were going out of business. I love it (in a DBS kind of way) and can’t wait for “How Did This Get Made?” to get around to covering it.

re: the lightsaber fight: I totally agree. Also, it was great seeing them go at it without pinballing off of every available piece of backdrop like the prequels. That fight was intense!

I just wanted to say how refreshing it was watching a lightsaber duel that looked like a real sword fight. I got very fatigued by the prequels with everyone jumping and twirling and flinging their bodies around—some out of necessity (like Yoda because he’s small) and some just for the hell of it (the entire Anakin/Obi…

I think they would have, only PG-13 was not introduced until ‘84. At the time the options were only PG and R. I think if your kid is ok with the original trilogy there is not likely to be anything above and beyond that benchmark here.

I would trust what these people are saying vis a vis what is in the new one, but for a little perspective the PG-13 rating wasn’t introduced until 1984. The original Star Wars trilogy would likely garner a PG-13 rating today. At the time, the only options were PG and R.

This rule doesn’t apply because he did not lose possession under incidental contact with the ground. This play would be governed under the rules for “backward pass and fumble.” Try harder.

No dumb dumb, it’s considered a “backward pass” which has the same effective rules as a fumble. See Section 2. Backward Pass and Fumble.

Sorry but no. He’s already in the throwing motion and could not have pulled the ball back if he tried. That’s called not having possession. It would have been a fumble if Duke had picked it up and ran it in. It’s still a fumble now.

This proves that he did not have possession. The ball is on the way out of his hand and he didnt fully control it any more. It is a technically a fumble and the player was in the act of fumbling when the knee touched down. If the duke player picked this ball up and ran it in from there, it would absolutely count as a…

He’s not a damn good coach. There is absolutely no evidence of that statement being anywhere near true for his entire 5 year span at Miami. In fact, his record against shitty ACC teams, anyone in the top 25, and Power 5 schools in general shows that he is not even mediocre. He recruited top 20 classes every year…

You really don’t have much of an idea of what you are talking about. The “probation” was 2 self-imposed bowl bans in years they were shitty anyway. They lost a total of 9 scholarships over 3 years as actual punishment from the NCAA. For the record, they lost 31 over 3 years before Butch Davis took over in 1995 and…

Nope try again.

This. You have hit it on the head. This is my least favorite trait of lawyers.