"Experiences only possible on PS3."

Oh god, now she's going around sticking her onus on everyone...

I obsessively collect CAH cards, but if the standard sets are wearing thin, look for Crabs Adjust Humidity. It's an unofficial expansion with great cards that integrate very well.

Video games as a sport has become a tenet of video games as a religion. If you call yourself a hardcore gamer, you're under social pressure to find the legitimacy in gaming as a sport. And if you can't, then they demand you accept it by faith.

I've opened many Xbox 360 controllers and to look at the plastic and the way it precariously sits on this one tiny button, you would think so. But I haven't seen a bumper button have a problem unless I was trying to put it in a modded controller.

Well, someone calling a gay person a faggot really is putting their diminutive IQ on display. It's not so much offense than it's the knowledge that whatever that person has to say is probably lacking in intellectual quality. The sooner someone were to get over their offense to the word, the sooner they can realize…

Being an asshole and being objectively correct aren't mutually exclusive. I guess we are talking about the difference between arguing and speaking persuasively, then.

Perhaps "right" was the wrong word to use here. What I'm trying to point out is that offense in itself shouldn't earn any hits. My claim is that offense doesn't entitle you to anything, much less a formal right to censor OR a societal response. Of course, this is the Internet and mob tactics are more useful than…

His argument is quite clear and you are merely trying to turn it back on him. The key assertion is that offense is itself without argument, which must be dealt with before you can claim the same about him. He's entitled to make his point first.

What are we supposed to do with a person who spends more time being offended and less time getting over themselves? What do we do with a person who thinks they can ride "being offended" forever? Maybe they don't want to NOT be offended because they will lose power over others. If certain people insist on cashing in on…

I think it's time for a "For the Lulz Summary Execution" law. If you cut across five lanes of traffic, a bullet in the head. If you send SWAT to someone's house, bullet in the head. If you leave the stickers on your hat, bullet in the head.

That's an interesting point because I and my family suffer from a familial tremor that makes us shake a little. It's hard to keep our hands truly still.

This is a strangely smart kid. She wants the iPod Touch, but she knows that to get it, she has to couch it in the middle of a stupidly expensive list of crap or shit that doesn't exist.

This entire conversation and justification is dependent on two flawed premises: video games are a sport, and sports are just that important.

Yeah, I bought the Xbox One for the multitasking. I can be in the middle of a game, have my wife come in and demand Netflix, jump over to Netflix with my voice, and when she's had her fill, jump back to the game. I'm also digging the voice control which lets me turn on the Xbox AND the TV with my voice and turn it off…

This is why I avoided Kotaku. Flamebait of the most sinister kind: stating opinion as fact. It borders on trolling honestly.

Yep, that's the last nail in the coffin. I'm not going to try picking up LOL.

You mean we are responsible for our own actions and it's our own job to police our own minds? How dare you impose responsibility on me!...

"Lanza also apparently maintained a spreadsheet with information about mass shootings over the years."

In other other news, the absence of this game at launch kept me from getting a PS4 immediately.