These had my interest, gimme Reinhardt and you’d have my attention.

*Checks thread* Nope, never made that claim, but I get it, reading is hard.

No part of this response, or any of your responses on this subject do anything to imply you have a brain.

So it’s OK for Ainge to do what’s best for the Celtics, but not for LeBron and KD to do what’s best for LeBron and KD? Agree to disagree I suppose.

Better a shill than a lunatic who loses his mind over a video game.

It shouldn’t amaze me like it does, yet every time something is written about this, I can’t help but think about the fans that cry traitor at players like KD and LeBron, when the second a team thinks they can do better a player is done.

So I’ve finally made my through Persona 5, and am looking for something new to consume my time. I want to try this, but after seeing the tips for playing the game seems insanely complicated to me, which is a little off putting. Does the game do a good job of easing you in, or is it as complicated as it seems?

They went for two because at least with 6 they have a chance to tie if Dallas scores an misses the xp, and they don’t get the ball back, which very nearly (and probably should’ve) happened.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

You magnificent son of a bitch

The Vita thing does make me sad, it’s a great handheld, me and the other 6 people who still have one love it!

They’ve already mentioned it wasn’t a straight port, that they’ve added features, and if you’re a big fan of IX, then 16 bucks isn’t really that crazy.

To be fair, it’s the second play on his list of 347, so it makes sense he calls it a lot. The first one is obviously a quick slant to Beckham.

I’m not sure why everyone is responding like I said the Packers would definitely win a rematch, my only point is that they were missing 4 of their best 7 or 8 players, and that if they had them in a potential rematch, I would give them a fair shot at winning. Atlanta is great, I’m not arguing they aren’t, last year…

It’s not excuses, it’s a fact that the Packers didn’t have those players. It’s a fact that those players play a large role in determining the Packers ceiling. It’s week 2, my original, and only point is that I didn’t see anything in that game that told me the Packers wouldn’t have a chance in a potential rematch. I’m…

...I didn’t make excuses, the Packers lost, I just don’t think there’s much to be taken from the game. I’d feel the same way if Atlanta came to Lambeau missing their two tackles, Vic Beasley and Jones was playing at half strength. But hey, keep being a dick, nice talking to you too.

Well, you seem like an unbiased observer, so thanks for that input. Also, given how many people have been fans of teams that haven’t won a single ring in their lifetime, I’ll be ok with one of that’s how it shakes out.

If suggesting you can’t take much from a game where one team was missing 3 of their best 5 or 6 players is making excuses, then OK I guess? I think Atlanta is good, and I think the Packers are good, and my only point was that nothing I saw last night made me feel any different about the Packers chances

I think it’s funny that other people are treating Atlanta like the Patriots because they had one great season. They also should’ve lost to the Mike Glennon Bears last week. My only point was that nothing I saw last night made me feel any worse or better about the Packers chances in January if there was a rematch.

Except unlike the Bears fans and Cutler, Rodgers and the Packers have actually been successful. Atlanta is good no doubt, but they also should’ve lost to the Bears last week, a lot can change over a season.