If he's meeting people online, just for safety's sake there should be at least one date in a public place. Once the FwB relationship is established it can just go straight to sleepovers, but you really shouldn't be inviting anyone over (or going to their place) without at least meeting them in person first.

I don't - there's no way they couldn't have had even an inkling of what they were getting into.

She won't even refer to genitalia in the books because she thinks that's not "proper" (that's why it's all "oh jeez, he's going downstairs/gosh, he's touching me down there"). It's sex for the sexually repressed - porn is not allowed.

The point is some guy has dreamed up a situation that as far as we know has never happened. But we do know that cosplaying is not about hooking up. It's about cosplaying.

Well, we could talk about the representation of women, but we all know how that ends...

and while we're at it, the people acting all horny are the guys. They are the ones calling false advertising, discrediting a woman's work because they are pretty and whatever else. Maybe instead of blaming the woman you take a look around you and consider whether you really want to be a part of that crowd. Because if…

well we could talk about the representation of women in video games, but that ends in harassment and rape threats. There is no pleasing some people and women will always be demonised whatever they do.

she's cosplaying, not going on a date. The only people implying that are some dudes on the internet who have decided that a woman existing in a public space is therefore clearly there to display herself to potential mates. I'll say it again: COSPLAY. She is literally there to misrepresent her identity.

So? If she can make a career out of cosplaying fair play to her - she clearly has talent. My point still stands: what is on display here is her talent, not her body.

She's not for sale, so it's not advertising. The only thing she's showcasing is her (fantastic) cosplaying skills.

I've read the comments, and while I understand how some people think this may have not been the best way to handle this, either because it's unhealthy or the may come to regret it, I can honestly say that there is nothing more satisfying than bridge burning.

I'm British, and we really don't go around calling everyone cunts. That word still has a lot of impact - sure, I'll call my sister a dozy cunt if she forgets where she put her keys or something, but you don't go around using it in conversation with just anyone.

EVERYONE:

I'm watching Graham Norton with Jamie Dornan, Julie Walters and Stephen Mangan. So far a guy in the audience shouted out "the books are shit!", and Julie Walters was surprised when Dornan said Grey learns to love by the end of the books/films.

For me with The Sun, it's because it's (supposed to be) a newspaper - we can discuss and debate objectification and nudity all day, but I think everyone agrees that tits aren't news.

I've just ordered "Walter The Farting Dog" for my niece - but really it's because I want to read it.

Try telling that to the people who defend Page 3 girls in The Sun - you'd think we were ganging up to castrate them.

Plus, as other articles have shown, these dicks are still harassing and threatening people. That should be news, and when they turn around and offer stupid shit like this, it should be reported on and shown how hollow it is. Those women aren't allowed to forget what arseholes they are seeing as they still stalk them,…

"You pick his headshot, his personality (cheerful and outgoing, sweet and shy, witty and educated, lovingly [?] nerdy"

I think it's the sign of a really great teacher. We had one when I was at school where even the shitty, violent students (and I went to a shitty violent school) would cooperate in his class. They would have been the ones on the sidelines shuffling along halfheartedly, but he probably could have gotten them to do it.