Why does it 'need' to.

I haven't bought a Assassin's Creed game in awhile but if they made one in Rome I'd be there day 1.

99 percent sure he couldn't do that just because HP puts the absolute minimum requirement power supplies in their PCs. So even though modern GPUs use less power it still wouldn't be enough and he would have to get a new PSU as well. Also, without at least an overclock that CPU would probably bottleneck any modern GPU.…

I could be wrong, but I think it was a plane crashing.

Woah, I remember seeing this forever ago but never knew Microsoft hired him. I have no doubts we'll be seeing some cool things from the Kinect this generation. I personally sold my Kinect 1 because I was disappointed by it, but Kinect 2 seems to of fixed every issue I had.

People had a right to be critical of the kinect 1, it didn't deliver on the promises made. The thing that annoys me though is how people seem to be ignoring all the obviously huge improvements Microsoft has made on the Kinect 2 and how it could be viable.

Yeaa that's why the xbox has more exclusives than playstation, because games don't matter.

The circle of life.

Do you manage to enjoy any game ever? Jesus, I've never seen some one nitpick so much.

All that shit confuses the hell out of me. MSAA, SMAA, TXAA, FXAA, and whatever the 10 others are. I always forget which one has the best look to performance cost ratio.

While I can't completely argue with the Battlefield 3.5 I personally like it and think it's worth the buy. The campaign is better than 3's was and the multiplayer feels much better as well. In short it's everything I wanted BF3 to be and more. I tried to go back and play BF3 after the beta ended and had to turn it off…

Yea I don't doubt it, and I'm still impressed by what they got out of the 360 version. You would just think if DICE can get BF4 to run at 60FPS while keeping it almost at ultra PC quality Ubisoft would be able to do the same with this. I wonder if they haven't fully tweaked their engine to use all of the threads on…

That's the thing, the new consoles aren't new hardware. They're an x86 AMD APU which is nothing new and has been around for a long while. This isn't another cell processor where they actually need time to re learn everything.

No I know, I'm not talking about the time, but more the difference from beginning to end. Stuff on the Ps3 (especially ports) ran like shit but got much better once they learned to work with it. With these consoles they're both using an architecture that has been around for forever that developers are already used to.…

That small of a graphical difference between the two and they still couldn't hit 60fps on the ps4? What?

That would normally be true, but the XB1 and PS4 aren't on special hardware anymore, they're x86 both with AMD APUs. While what you say is true to an extent it's no where near as drastic as the beginning of say the Ps3 and no one knowing how to develop with the cell processor properly.

Yes, I like their exclusives more so that's why I'll be getting XB1 first. I'm actually excited about the Kinect 2 and until proven otherwise the XB1 OS looks to be more to my liking than the PS4's. Also, I'm one of the millions upon millions of people who still has cable television (despite the internet making it…

Oh wow I couldn't help but laugh at this. I've never seen some one read so far into a one sentence comment and come to so many false conclusions.

The only thought I have whenever seeing any game in this genre is some one please give me a new Heavenly Sword game!!!

"That you just wasted $60 on a game that doesn't even let you play."