CharlesEastwest
CharlesEastwest
CharlesEastwest

Of all the horrors the internet has taught me in the last 20 years, this is up there. I expect it from 4chan and indiscreet Google Image Searches, but YOU, science?

All these fancy scientists always goes on about how dark matter is "invisible" and "hard to detect" and "hypothetical," but I can see it! It's purple, and kinda blue.

I initially read the headline as

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Why didn't you start taking baths?

What do you mean they're tricks? As opposed to witchcraft?

"I'm."

To any 9 fans starving for more, I recommend the 50th anniversary novella The Beast of Babylon. It's very short, but it recontextualizes Eccleston's performance in an interesting way, if you felt like he felt a little "off" when he went all light and friendly. (It's got some generally neat scifi stuff in it, too.)

Ya happy, SJWs? The PC police have made it verboten to punch people in the face for giving you a sandwich. Thanks, Obama!

I seriously doubt he or she advocates forced labotomization.

I really hope you're right about True Detective. On the bright side, unlike Vince Vaughn, I won't even notice if he is bad.

I can't remember what Taylor Kitsch looks like while I'm looking directly at him. It's SO WEIRD. He's like a Doctor Who monster!

new star Liam Hemsworth

It totally did (in this universe). John Oliver, Last Week Tonight.

CLASSIC Albert.

On reflection I see how my argument seemed to shift sideways a little bit over the hours and that probably was confusing. I'm sorry. I wasn't trying to be dishonest; we've been doing this for so long that *I* got confused. My position is "if it's not hurting anyone, I don't care," but I think ambiguity towards rape IS

I'M calling them rape simulations. I was calling them "rape cartoons" to belittle them, and then I realized I didn't want to belittle them, because this is more serious than that. I made a conscious decision to change what I called them. If you think 'rape simulation' is inaccurate, I'd be interested to know why. It's

Wait, hold on, I need to add this to my last comment, because you confused me and my argument: when I talk about condoning this, I'm not calling out people who aren't actively coming in here to reject rape simulations, or who read it and don't comment. I'm calling out people who are actively saying "I think this is

Dude. You're misapplying the language of the oppressed again. It's not "witchhunting" if someone says "I'm a witch," or "I like witches," or "witches are okay with me," and you say "I disapprove of witches, etc." Witchhunting is suspecting that someone is a witch, demanding to know if they're a witch, trying to force