BurningSpear
BurningSpear
BurningSpear

While I don’t find Howard Stern entertaining or amusing in the slightest, and have never listened to more than about half an hour of one show, I think the key difference is that Stern knowingly makes his crude comments for their entertainment value whereas Trump is dead serious.

Howard Stern is a recognized “shock jock”. It’s literally his job to say those things, and he’s been lambasted for them literally his entire career. It’s just REALLY old news now so we don’t hear about it.

The Economist’s new cover:

The cables in the beginning were actually in front of 111 8th ave.

Guys... guyyys.... Trump’s not that bad. I mean definitely, DEFINITELY VOTE FOR HILLARY, but he COULD be president, ya know? He might win! He just might! He’s not like, disqualified or anything, just like, not a good choice. But he’s a choice! He’s very popular, after all! And he... created jobs? Or something! So yeah

Man, Wired’s video player sucks. Once I finally got the video to play, I was entertained, though. It’s always a bit jarring actually hearing Lucy Lawless actually get to use her native accent because it seems like such a rare thing sometimes. I’d watch a whole show of this.

How did it take 45 minutes for someone to use this reference?

The TV show was based on the Soderbergh film? Man, Mike Judge took some muthafuckin’ liberties.

But then your 8-bay NAS crashes and you have to figure out how to backup 12TB of content before doing a rebuild. (True story)

Hunter “no such thing as off the record,” “I could afford to burn all my bridges” Thompson:

That’s the most horrifying thing about this, what he’s done to erode freedom of the press.

  • Hunter Thompson once wrote: “There are a lot of ways to practice the art of journalism, and one of them is to use your art like a hammer to destroy the right people — who are almost always your enemies, for one reason or another, and who usually deserve to be crippled, because they are wrong. This is a dangerous

I feel like all of Dave’s time on Kinja has been leading to this moment.

Rather than focus on real journalists, I think it’s time to put the feet of cable newscasters and producers to the fire. They created the Trump-as-mythical-viable-candidate-character from whole cloth. They still, today, air hour after hour of interviews and panel discussions featuring dishonest, vapid, disingenuous

What if your boss then asked “Just what do you think you’re doing, Dave?”

What scares me is that he is poisoning the well of yet another presidency. Wouldn’t it be nice to have one side lose yet say, “ I don’t agree with him or her, don’t even like her, but she won fair and square.”

Burning seems harsh. Can’t we first just toss him in a lake and see if he floats?

If Sanders had won the primary (and I won’t rehash whether or not the primaries were fairly contested), there is zero doubt he would have a 15-point lead right now and win over 400 electoral votes. I would have donated every spare penny I had to him. Alas.

Fellow Democrats: if you want more liberal-leaning people at the top of the ticket, you need to vote more liberal people in down the ticket. That means showing up for primaries, that means actually knowing people’s policy positions, that means writing to your representatives about issues, that means grass-roots

In America—despite our inequality and blatant cronyism—the socialists never win. The socialists never could have