No, they're not. Your four-year education costed $80,000, and not $20,000.

No, I want to make some things clear here:

You're the one trying to make the case that things should be different, not me. The onus is on you to provide some meat here.

John Starks, 2/18 FGM for 11% shooting from the field, 0/11 3PM.

We're pointing out here that income disparities exist worldwide across every single field ever, not to provide you with some launchpad for your retarded screed about why that is, or to make point by point comparisons between minimum wage workers and athletes. You see, even the most skilled workers *still* produce…

I mean, never mind the fact that they AREN'T for the most part getting great educations because they have to spend so much time earning their football scholarship that they can only pass by either taking laughably easy courses or having their grades enhanced by the school desperate for the money it makes off their…

The people who assemble iPhones make $1.80 an hour, and yet Apple sold them for $14 billion in profits last year.

Employment is slavery! Scholarships are slavery! Viva la proletariat!

The people who assemble iPhones make $1.80 an hour, and yet Apple made $14 billion selling them last year.

$20,000 education?

Royce White.

Yeah I guess the whole framework of this is that even (what I guess I've accepted as) front page "articles" are themselves posts. In which case, that's probably exactly what Tom was referring to, and then all the responses that built off of that.

That is the best Chris Broussard pic, though. It's right up there with the "sources" meme stuff. It's like he's been caught in a brief moment when his stupid appearance perfectly mirrors the stupid things he says.

I don't know about executions, but there's a good chance the NBA players get stoned.

Every time Chris Broussard talks about sexuality, it's the best. He is way more interesting to make fun of for having bad opinions about human beings, than he is for having bad opinions about basketball.

I took it as a very artful and deliberate approximation of Bill Simmons' writing "style."

It's rewarding to see my impression that Bill Simmons is a miserable, self-aggrandizing blowhard illustrated in handy graphical form.

Don't "rivalries" presuppose some kind of constant, historical battle between two teams, tit for tat, often without any clear winner?

I don't know about grapes, but baboons clearly love melons.

Hey Tom (or anybody else), could you please link to that post?