It isn't out yet, so how can there be anything to play lol?

Person 1: "[Insert lie here] is the fact of the matter, and here's how you can find the evidence."

And if a fire destroys your collection? You lose it all, whereas if it was digital, it'd just be a matter of buying a new device and getting the collection back. And overall, the fire has better odds of actually happening. Those odds are still ridiculously low, of course. But the fact is, if you're judging mediums on…

You are required to sign up for a subscription for verification. Greatly helps with fighting bots. You get a pending full-month charge, with lasts for a few hours to a day or two (depending on how shitty your bank is), and you do not actually pay to any subscription until the free month is up.

So fun to read now.

Trolling does not mean what you think it means.

6/10 trolling. You've got the enraged, braindead retorts down pat, but the best trolls can actually trick people into agreeing, and the first post is just too goddamn stupid for that.

Honestly, I think it comes down to what kind of games you enjoy most. The person like me, whose top priority is story and at least somewhat strategic gameplay, gets a very good shooter that may not be worth $60+, but is worth $40 at the least.

Well, those reviews are useful. And they exist in many easy to find places. One of the nice things about user reviews like this is that it sends a very clear message: people are having fun.

I think that opinion is mainly due to how rare it is.

Makes sense to me. The original Half-Life was far more of a trendsetter, but Half-Life 2 is the better game today. No reason to nitpick over which quality is more important.

Ah, I see. Honestly, it seems like that guy read into something that wasn't there, the OP latched on for no reason, and the whole thing turned into a (very small) clusterfuck. I regret my part in it.

I disagree that it's not well designed for as-you-fancy gameplay.

Either Half-Life, or [insert Blizzard game from that era].

Was this comment dismissed? It's clearly not there now.

True. And honestly, I'm not personally offended by the "kids" thing; it's a common phrase that was used for no reason. But when a guy blows two burner comments out of proportion and then claims others want drama, the offended become the saner side.

As you've said, it's a common turn of phrase. And, in its common usage, it's almost always either addressed to people who are actually expected to be kids, or very condescending. So condescension is the natural assumption, since few of us are kids.

Archeage? Wildstar?

Which assumes that the replayability is what matters to the player.

Mentioning Tomodachi Life makes me think you are being very, very sarcastic.