BaldwinTheLesser
BaldwinTheLesser
BaldwinTheLesser

My money is on Arson instead of disturbing the peace. Just about every boy growing up back then got the gas can for the lawn mower out of the garage and set some damn thing on fire in the backyard. Or at least they did in my neighborhood (Detroit). Kids these days don't set shit on fire like they used to.

I remember hearing the 9-part thing as a kid and thinking it was bullshit then. Even as a stupid little twerp I could watch RotJ and see that the story had wrapped up and that Lucas was full of shit about there being more. The prequel trilogy was an unnecessary, naked cash grab, but it least makes sense in the

Not really. Our evolutionary history is a lot more than natural selection and random mutations. Environmental factors are what largely determines whether a certain trait is beneficial or detrimental at any given time. If there hadn't been small, four-legged rodents on earth at just the right time 65 million years ago,

I'm going to guess the six you've done are arson, vandalism, open container, public nudity, public urination and/or defecation, and shoplifting. That's my guess because I too have done all six of those and they are indeed a lot of fun.

No, it's not an assumption. In order to be salaried and effectively making below minimum wage, you have to be working some kind of overtime beyond what the job description calls for. That's not an assumption, that's just how numbers work.

Getting married and reproducing before you are financially capable of supporting that lifestyle is irresponsible, hence "too young". Did that really need explaining or are you just trying to be dense?

According to the OP, it sounds like grandpa doesn't want them there, that's the problem. Did you even read the post?

Maybe it's because I read the post? His salary breaks down to $6 an hour. That means he's paid a set amount every week and he unfortunately has to put in more than a few hours of overtime to do his job. That's not me making an assumption and talking out of my ass, that's me taking what she said at face value.

It also says he's salaried at his job and his salary boils down to $6 an hour, which means he's working quite a bit more than 40 hours a week to earn that salary. Sorry I read between the lines and was able to deduce that he's not a full time caretaker, I guess reading comprehension must be a side effect of getting

He has a job though, he's only a caretaker in that he brings grandpa some shit while he's there.

That explanation almost sounds plausible if it weren't for the fact that the guy does have a job. A delivery boy who occasionally brings soup is not the same as a live in nurse.

I know, I'm sure it does come off as unduly harsh. But that comment is pure WTF level lack of self awareness and no one else wanted to to touch it. It's a big enough problem for her to post it and no one else wanted to respond so I figured why not be useful and say the actual thing just about anyone who read that was

Right, because pointing out that she's essentially been sponging off of a dying in-law for 5 years and now sees the prospect of possibly moving out as an inconvenience to her means someone pissed on my head this morning. It couldn't possibly be that I found the total lack of self-awareness objectionable and thought

So, you got married and started breeding way too young to a guy who is basically unemployable and you've been living rent free in your husband's dying grandfather's house for all of this, and you think the grandfather might possibly resent you for being there? Hmmm, I can't imagine why that might be a problem for the

I have to step away from the Internet, I've been thoroughly sucked into this utterly pointless argument. I'd call him a troll just based on how much I much I took the bait, but he's clearly commenting in earnest. Not a troll, just genuinely committed to getting the last word. Time for me to GTFO.

I'm taking your definition to it's logical conclusion. The refs on the field, by definition, are a group of people. I literally cannot state it any simpler than that.

Where did I acknowledge that? Most of the world would consider religion innate, it's only western civilization in the last maybe two centuries that some people stopped considering it innate. I specifically mentioned the etymology of the word in my last response, I guess it was a mistake to think you'd be able to take

Yeah, I'm already kicking myself for responding to him more than a one-off. I just pointed out to him that if I said "these refs are the worst" during a football game, I'd be bigoted against football referees by his definition. Its like the anti-dentite episode of Seinfeld, just no dude, that's not how it works. That

You said "___s are the worst." with CR in the blank. Saying that makes you a bigot. If someone said the same thing but inserted black people into the blank, would you call them a bigot?

1) Convenient? That's what happened, asshole. I clicked your response, replied to it, then independently expanded the rest of the thread. That's not convenient, that's just how Kinja works you twat.