Stop objectifying men.

But despite the complaints and a request for the city to censor the poster, KRQE reports that the city can't do shit

GG was created specifically *for* harassing women

...and her video above, a deadly clear snapshot of how obvious cracks in basic logic can be navigated, easily, by a clever public speaker with halfway decent video production and a willingness to pander to an audience that's aching to be pandered to.

This isn't racist.

All of those butts are ugly as sin. Them ladies need to do some squats.

"IT'S CAUSE DEM FATTIES DUN'T EXERCISE/EAT TOO MUCH!" that's a reductive, simplistic answer that doesn't tell the whole story.

BMI is generally a good measurement for society's weight trends. Sure, there are people who are considered overweight, who simply have a lot of muscle mass, but they are in the minority.

Stop calling ISIS "the Islamic State." There are many islamic states in the world.

It doesn't fit.

Now if only we could do the same to Gawker Media sites.

This is a really good question.

Best way to get dat ass? Heavy barbell back squats. Look at powerlifters and olympic weightlifters. Hnnnngh.

Even shorter list:

It's probably no more legitimate than being a professor of women's studies.

Live in fear.

This has to be the ultimate first world problem. Food is in such abundance that not only are you free from hunger, you eat so much as to be physically incapable of fitting into human-sized clothes.

That's the weird thing about quantum mechanics, though. Consider placing two detectors (let's call them A and B) such that the photon, after exiting the beam splitter, has a 50% probability of hitting either detector. When the photon exits the beam splitter, its wavefunction is split between both possible paths. The…

Not true. Look up the EPR paradox. Quantum events cannot be determined based on initial conditions. If you shoot a photon at a beam splitter, there is a 50% chance it will be reflected, and a 50% chance it will pass through. You don't know which will happen until you take a measurement.

He said it corroborated, not proved their theory. I've read some of Penrose's work, and he is always careful to distinguish between proven science and speculative theorization.