Areskahn
Areskahn
Areskahn

I don’t watch any of the videos; not really my bag, but I don’t really understand the difference between what they are doing versus the things Oprah did on her show. She constantly gave away free cars and houses and all kinds of stuff to people and received plenty of clout-fueled views from it. Now I believe she had a

Money definitely is the biggest factor for sure, but I think there are a couple other cultural things as well. I think growing up with the 24/7 unending internet content for their entire lives has kind of made a lot of people less outgoing in person in many ways. It’s much easier to “hang out” with friends/family in

Exactly. It would be god awful. If Martinet could do a toned down version, then maybe, but anytime I’ve heard a full sentence from Mario, it was painful.

Absolutely false. I’ve been playing a bunch of stuff I never looked at before that definitely aren’t exclusives. R6: Extraction, Back4Blood, upcoming Sniper Elite 5, none of those are exclusives. There’s constantly stuff that aren’t exclusives that I’ve been able to jump into now. A couple EA Play games here and

But... why? Why is style something that has to be unique or else it’s bad?

I guess a question to ask in regards to how people view things as theft is whether that is a good thing to feel in the first place. Is it constructive or even correct to feel “robbed”? If you are making something to specifically harm another person/group’s work, then yeah, it’s a bad thing to do on a moral level

I’ve held off on the second season cause the first was just not good. I think they rushed into the show to capitalize on the real Space Force stuff happening, and made a pretty messy show as a result. They made a show solely to make the whole thing out to be a joke, but then also wanted us to root for Carell’s

Am I the only one who hates it when people use fictional stories and movie plots as proof of anything? Just because some rando is able to write a heavily contrived story about society acting in a very specific way they purposely set up in order to make a fabricated point, that doesn’t mean they actually know anything

I actually just used my grandmother’s mixer for the first time today because I saw this and remembered I gad it. I don’t often bake or make things that would need the mixer due to the diet I have been on for about year now, but it made the cheesecake I made this afternoon a lot easier for sure.

Why are you choosing to ignore the 10 games that came out in the last two weeks? They still came out in February, I don’t really understand only talking about the last two weeks of the month as if that’s all that is being offered in the month?

idk, if you watch the clip it seems fairly benign.

I like how you guys are complaining about a guy complaining about a guy’s review. Like you guys being hostile this guy and insulting him is ok, but him being hostile to someone else(that you don’t know and have never met) on the internet is bad. God, internet discourse is shit.

Now if I had to kill so many murlocs and raiders each day to get points and redeemed those points to have the gun mailed to me, that just wouldn’t seem like Fallout to me.

FYI, Seasons have never had a consistent length. They are not “traditionally” 10 weeks. It’s gone 10, 13, 19, 10, 9.

Does anyone agree with this take? The trailer/reveal stuff seems fun and close to 2 and 3 in terms of wackiness. I never played 4 because of how wacky it was getting(and that it was just 3 with superpowers)

In other words “ I don’t want to think for myself and read the article, I just want to be mad and stay misinformed like Kotaku tells me to”.

Man, people really need to read things for themselves. This statement has reasonable context in the original article. She didn’t present the information randomly, the article was about c-sections, birthing experiences and beliefs, and what it means to have control over your pregnancy. The author directly states that

FYI, you should probably read the original article. It’s literally all about birth experiences and being in control of the birthing process, not some random interview with Bialik. The context of that quote is actually pretty reasonable. It wasn’t something random she brought up, it was part of the discussion. In one

This is a pretty ridiculously hostile take for someone who literally has no information. You should probably read the original article the quote is from. Her comment is not some random thing she said, it was in direct response to a conversation she was having with the author about bad birth experiences and the author

It actually makes sense if you read the article. But nobody here, including Kotaku, will ever do that right? Who cares about context?

The author brought up the question of whether the author herself was meant to give birth because she had such a traumatic first birth and was on her second and was comparing holistic vs