If you read the article it comes from(which of course nobody does anymore) The article itself is about a woman who had a traumatic experience giving birth in a hospital(she had high blood pressure, they tried to induce labor, they give her a pain drug and she hallucinated from it for many hours, next day the induction…

HAHAHA. You literally know nothing about anything. You are a just a random dumbass on the internet who ACTUALLY believes an article on Kotaku, one of the most clickbaity sites around. You should really stop making kneejerk reactions and acting like you know anything. There are real allegations about real things in the…

Or maybe it’s just actually being honest about acceptable evidence and not basing things on my own hindsight like a jackass.

It was not VERY well known. If it was he wouldn’t be doing talk shows and gigs all throughout 2013. Just because something is known by some doesn’t mean it’s known by all and assuming that is an awful precedent if you care at all about real justice instead of internet brownie points.

They easily could not have. You literally can’t know and are only using bullshit biased hindsight. Cosby was on fucking talk shows and doing stand-up throughout 2013, including two weeks after the pic was taken. People didn’t really know. And assuming they had to know because of your own hindsight is incredibly biased…

Wow, you kind of really suck. You can’t even entertain the idea that a photo taken a year before the Cosby allegations blew up could just be a room with a photo of him in it. You know for a fact they knew what most of the world didn’t. You are an amazing person using your hindsight in such an incredible and not at all…

Why was Cosby still doing talk show appearances in 2013? He did the Daily Show in Nov of 2013, did Jon Stewart and everyone there know and didn’t care, are they secret rapists, or maybe it’s not as widespread as people are assuming?

This is where I’m at. I have a hard time believing they would not only nickname a suite the “Cosby Suite”, but also procure a framed portrait of him for a hotel room at an event, a frame that also matches the decor in the room. And nobody actually seems that concerned the info is out. Like if you had a secret rape…

That still doesn’t mean they HAD to know. Hindsight is a hell of a thing, and it’s completely possible that they weren’t in the know. It was not as common a knowledge as it was post 2014. Assuming they knew because we ALL know now is absurd. I’m not defending the kind of things that may have happened, but I just hate…

People should also keep in mind that people CAN not know things. I had a friend in 2014 who named their new kitten Cosby. I guess they were secretly worshipping a rapist(probably not cause they changed it after the accusations starting rolling in later that year.) Hell, I saw Bill Cosby live in 2009. The “open” secret…

FFS, Nowhere am I defending them. I don’t give a shit about any of these people. I think people automatically jumping to a conclusion with literally nothing but hindsight is just bullshit, no matter who is involved or what is being alleged. Fuck off and maybe read what I already wrote douchebag.

They did include the explanation... in the article. Whether it’s the truth or not, who knows. I’m just saying that the idea that they obviously must have known is ridiculous when most of the world was blissfully unaware of it even if this other guy in the comments read an article about it in 2005. Applying what we…

So everyone is you? There were some magazine articles, a dying medium in the mid-2000s, so the whole world should know? Really? The only reason people know about it today is because it went viral in 2014. I never said said they couldn’t have known about, I literally said they could have heard the rumors or heard about…

I’m sorry, but a fuckton of people knew nothing about it until Hannibal Buress made it viral in 2014. Obviously there were rumors and court cases/reports available, but they were not well publicized at all and that info didn’t spread around the world. Are you saying you knew about it in 2005? I doubt it. Most of the…

I would think a lot of people would be confused. It wasn’t really public knowledge until late 2014. Maybe one of them heard about it somehow, but realistically they probably didn’t apply the current connotation to it then.

From what I had heard at the time, they were only planning to do a limited release to only like 50-100k users or something, then decided at the last minute to just open the flood gates instead. I think the idea was to show it off and collect data, then try to get theatres to subsidize it. But they just ran out of money…

Even if it’s in a tourist kind of area, I don’t see YouTube “Exposure” as being that beneficial unless she gets tons of views, but she seems to get about 30-80k. With those numbers, I doubt any of those restaurants got any customers from her videos, maybe a couple if a fan happens to live near a place she went to. And…

Far Cry games have a lot of issues with ludonarrative dissonance. Far Cry 5 the most. I hate it when I, the player, know what apparently my character can’t figure out and I have to do what I know is wrong or takes away control for me.

You mean apart from the author? The title of the article clearly indicates they believe that a cis white person can’t be a progressive character and the entire article doesn’t mention homosexuality at all, completely ignoring it.

But being non-cis is not the only means of progression.