AlmightyHamSandwich
AlmightyHamSandwich
AlmightyHamSandwich

.

I would be so much more on board with her outfit they simply chose EITHER having her tits out or the booty shorts. Having both of them just makes it too, too ridiculous.

One of the oddest things mentioned in an early report on PS Home (on this site, I think), was that people in a shared space actually had to queue up to play minigames, just because of the way it was set up. That is not the kind of experience that should be replicated in an online environment.

Yes and no. The laws of physics are what they are and top performance will always require a power and thermal profile that is incompatible with a laptop.

Amen to that, TF2 is so much more sophisticated in the way the needlessly created a hat system to scam money off its player base.

Not as sensitive as you are.

Amost the same fighting system as "Marvel Nemesis: Rise of the imperfects" Great fighting game. The freedom you had on each stage was my favorite part, the approaches and surprises you can pull of to your adversary where lovely.

I've never seen the problem unless people think steam should hold a higher standard and are personally insulted that they don't. After all you're on the internet buying a digital game. The same internet that lets you look up said game to see if its any good. If you can't bother to do that then its your own damn fault.

Love this game but the similarities to The Impossible Game are a bit too close. I'm all for borrowing ideas (especially good ones) but this seems a bit too blatant to me.

The NFL wins. The NFL always does.

You know what gets me. The fact slut shaming even came into it. If she had been a man, it would have been no bother (hell, he would have been championed as a bloody hero for banging another woman and getting another notch in the bed post!), but these "gamers" are using her gender as a reason to bully her and other

"He" if you are referring to the Shepard most people played. "She" if you are referring to the Shepard that makes the video game better.

My only thought is this: examining violence in games, and how we react to it and why is important, but it's hard for me to muster that effort when there's something about this game feels fundamentally dishonest. I realize that may sound absurd, but... it screams marketing gimmick, and not a very good one at that—I

The death threats and such are ignored with perfect epistemic closure: GamerGate is about journalistic ethics, therefore anyone sending threats or doing anything besides discussing journalistic ethics is not A True Gamergater.

Well, people who take it so seriously and are very aggressive aren't your typical college students I guess. They are probably stereotypical "no-lifes". I can't imagine someone having normal social life and normal work having time to be so engaged in a debate on Twitter. And to make such horrible threats.

Okay, seriously. What in the actual fuck, folks?

I teach English at the college level; last year, I was privileged to teach ENG 230, which at my institution is a rotating (through the faculty) course that is generously labeled "Special Topics in Literature."

I taught my course, for two semesters, as "Gaming: Literary

I Like it! It will certainly make for interesting matches, and it makes Ganondorf (My favorite character) even more deadly at higher percentages! Imagine what kind of a monster Little Mac might become.