I agree. But a 13 year-old has better judgement than a 5 year-old and should know better than to pull a real looking gun on a cop he’s running away from, no?
I agree. But a 13 year-old has better judgement than a 5 year-old and should know better than to pull a real looking gun on a cop he’s running away from, no?
To be fair, if the police’s account is true, he was 13 (not 5) and should know better than to pull a toy gun (that looks exactly like a real gun) on the police.
I would suggest that we select candidates who didn’t have aversions to being open and transparent. She doesn’t think people have the right to know anything.
And you know that because you’ve seen the medical records? Or are you just taking her word on it? I mean obviously she’s not as healthy as Trump because his doctor called him the healthiest candidate ever, and since we’re taking everyone’s word on everything today...
Of course not. Hillary could suck the blood from living babies and Jezebel would dismiss at as a ‘quirky thing she does’. Just like Trump could be found with dead hookers in his plane and Breitbart would cheer him on.
“The public has a right to know the condition of the president’s health”
Yeah, who needs a transparent government anyway? I’m sure whatever they decide for us is best! People who like to be informed are idiots!
Unless she just straight collapses in front of the ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD during the 15th anniversary of 9/11 right!?
It’s not better. Though I thought one of the Gawker sites had posted a link to that as well.
Nothing disqualified their input. I resorted to ignoring their input because they disqualified my input. I was spoken over or straight up ignored. So now, I dont pay attention and just say what I want. If i am spoken over, i just say “wait what did you just say? Because I am saying.....” etc.
One of the many ways men also suffer from gender inequality in our society.
Actually, this isn’t the first Jezebel has mealy mouthed around the word ‘rape’ even when it is safely preceded by ‘allegedly’. It’s quite weird.
Based on the description of the injuries she sustained and the fact that she may have had a direct electronic message that was an admission of the rape, it seems like you would have to be a special kind of misogynistic to not believe her.
*If all this career thing doesn’t pan out for me, I can always find me a woman with a promising career and good income, settle down, have children with her and let her take care of me for the rest of my life.*
Men rarely have those options.
Whose hailing this as a triumph? By Colorado law Cinemark had the right to recoup costs in a litigation case that the plantiffs lost. They didn’t want to keep having to pay for appeals and agreed to not pursue the claim if the plaintiffs agreed to no further appeals. Oh as for ‘next time we might not be so generous so…
This is the outcome I was expecting to come from this. Honestly I think it’s the right one. I feel for the families of the victims and the survivors. That said the idea that the theater should be liable for the actions of a rouge gun wielding maniac is a stretch. Cinemark had to know that they were getting killed in…
Masturbation is not legal in Italy, you will still receive a huge fine. What the high court had stated is that they do not believe that there should be jail time for public indecency, most countries carry a fine or small prison sentence. I think Italy is a mess, but there always seems to be a lot of misinterpretation…
They got divorced 4 years after the movie and had been married for 23 years. It's probably more complicated than you make it out in this comment