Are you really going the *oh the innocent children* route with this? Teenagers and even preteens are capable of all kinds of deranged crimes. Take a look.

Even a child can pull a trigger. Would you want to be the one facing a child potentially pointing a gun at you, thinking, hmm, is this child going to shoot me now? What would you do? If you’d say you’d never shoot, you’d put your life in the hands of a complete stranger who might be hostile towards you.

Pet couturiers! First world affluenza at its worst.

I don’t think I would attack innocent truckers with “stones, metal bars and wooden stakes”, but that’s just me.

Ok, how does that change anything? Does it matter when it happened? It was either leaked by an insider, breaching confidentiality rules or the mails got hacked (more likely). Again, how is this more ethical than the DNC mail leaking?

I wonder how this site ‘obtained’ these mails. You guys still blow a gasket about the Russian hackers and the DNC Mails? Yeah right, privacy my ass!

What disqualifies their input, in your opinion? The fact that they are men, older, or both?

Matt Damon, movie superstar, one of the most bankable actors today.

1) Almost all western countries have paternity leave, the statistical wage gap still exists. So no, this does not contribute to the gap.

Isn’t it a great thing, that feminism almost never makes any generalizing observations about men?

There is a wage gap, but it’s not based on gender discrimination. It is based on career decisions and work/life balance decisions made by both men and women, oh and the unwillingness of a greater number of women to negotiate their salary (aka the confidence gap). Once you factor those in, the gap all but disappears.…

Funny, no one on jezebel called the alleged rape by Nate Parker and his buddy a ‘threesome’. It’s almost as if the participation of a female perpetrator completely changed the narrative, huh.

Lol, the wage gap? That, as usually, explains everything. Oh, it’s raining outside, must be b/c of the wage gap. /s

I live in the 21st century and in every survey I’ve ever read about this topic, women valued the ability to providevery high, much higher than men do. What does that tell you, buster? I couldn’t give a rat’s ass about your anecdotal evidence, all I know is, that when it comes to the dating market, the guy with the six…

So, in your opinion both men and women have the same chances to forgo a professional career and be a stay at home spouse and society looks at them in the same way? Are you fucking kidding me?

Then why does your “average, normal, modern woman” still lists career aspirations and income (aka the ability to provide) as very important when choosing her partner in every survey, to this day?

I was talking about being taken care of as an OPTION. Do you not know what an option is? Sheesh indeed!

Describing statistics doesn’t mean putting people in a box. Statistically, women live longer than men, that doesn’t mean that this 102 year old man, who oulived his wife by 20 years doesn’t exist. Survey after survey, for decades, has come up with the same result - the ability to provide *is* a very important factor…

Here’s a thing that you’ve never heard a man say: *If all this career thing doesn’t pan out for me, I can always find me a woman with a promising career and good income, settle down, have children with her and let her take care of me for the rest of my life.*

Close, but no cigar.