So lets see if I get this: You were hungover, late to the plane, and tired then lashed out at someone who was probably also quite tired and spent the rest of your time with them being, in your own words, passive-aggressive.

Seems reasonable, they could be hiding anything up there. Do you want to be the guard who gets in trouble when the members of Pussy Riot use their wombs to smuggle a machinegun into the prison? I don't think so.

The constant shifting of nutritional advice has convinced me that I'm just going to stop eating entirely and subsist on the all-natural energy of the cosmic aether.

I didn't say men are raped more than, so let's not play that game. I know for a fact that the difference drops dramatically when you classify "man forced to have sex against his will" as rape. We also know that men are far less likely to report sexual abuse than women (based on interviews with people documented to…

Yeah, infantalize that adult woman! Feminism! Wooooooo!

How, exactly, could Nicholson have hosted the party while he was in a different country? When someone says "can I use your house while you're out of town?" and then rapes a child inside you can hardly be said to have "hosted the rape party" in any reasonable sense.

Right, bro, that's what I'm saying! The uggos need love they just gotta know they don't got a chance with me.

And no ugly bitches either, right, bro?

That's certainly not something I expected.

The only measure by which women are raped "massively" more often than men is the measure where "man forced to have sex with a woman" is classified as sexual assault rather than rape. Thanks for erasing victims of rape, though, that's always fun.

Agreed in principle but the behavior of the school and police here was disgustingly inappropriate. The serious problem isn't that the boy wasn't convicted of rape but the way that the incident was treated. Taking accusations of rape seriously in general will help both men and women.

Well that's just unbelievably disgusting.

There was nothing creepy about the interaction caught on film "I'll be waiting" doesn't come out of nowhere, its a final joke at the end of a bit of banter. At worst that makes Jackson look a bit full of himself.

Always nice to see a good old fashioned bit of reductive thinking about gender.

Fiction?

Wait, why does Jezebel want him to write a column if they think he's the type of person who is only superficially nice because he believes women will be obligated to have sex with him in exchange?

He's allowed to say what he wants and then we're allowed to respond, that's how freedom works. People who can't deal with it when people take offense should get out of the comedy business.

I didn't say that the OP claimed that "men habitually leer at women". I took objection to the idea that every time a man does something that makes a woman uncomfortable the goal was to make her uncomfortable. That's stupid. The final question is "do they really not know they're being gross?" to which the answer is…

You're clearly taking the position in the OP that men who leer at women do so with full knowledge that they're being gross. I really can't imagine why you'd believe something so stupid. No one ever sets out with the intention of being creepy. I mean you can toss around "aspie" all you like but you've obviously…

How big a part of the movie is sex or is this just a "all interactions between men and women are about sex" type of thing?