00lex00
00lex00
00lex00

"This is universal."

Leering is something perceived by the person being looked at.

So your advice here is "stop making false sick claims"? Wow.

No, men do not look at women with the sole intention of intimidating them. Let's try to have at least a little perspective here.

The context of this in India is pretty horrific and doesn't translate well to the experience of a gay man in America.

Here is where it gets really weird:

Talk about woman-splaning.

"The most offensive part of this theory is that women are basically idiots"

Erm, are you familiar with the past hundred years of statistical science? They looked at men and women separately.One thing to note is that the effect was not enormous. It was a ten point scale. Male authors had an average rating of 5.33 and female authors had an average rating of 5.26. Over time, of course, this

Here's the thing people miss: She's a psychologist. When she researches "why do people succeed" she's researching specifically psychological things (luck is never mentioned in interview only in this article). Economists will report on economic things. Sociologists will report on social things. Biologists will report

100% agree, the fact our culture that tolerates and glorifies violence against men in the media while erasing and mocking violence against men in reality is clearly a thing we should find amusing.

It's really fascinating how we polarize figure who are not especially partisan themselves.

Here's the problem, though, a lot of people (especially women in my experience) have a clear idea of what the "female experience" is like and react against women who have, in their view, had their gender identity removed. For some reason our culture really wants each woman to represent all women. That's a major reason

Is there an entry for "passing autistic"? You won't believe the shit people say about autism in front of anyone who can hold a conversation.

No, I'm clear on the law. I just think it will be an uphill battle for them.

Our society rarely sees sexual harassment within a gender the same as across genders, especially female to male.

As a person who is very concerned about the negative effects of our social construction of gender on men I am unambiguously happy to see this article on Jezebel.

I swear polyamorous people on the internet are so wildly reactionary that it almost stops making sense. Why must people insist that polyamory not only is the best thing for everyone but that it's also panacea to the world's ills? I think its great if people want to be poly (I've got one friend who loves being in a

Thanks for posting this story.

Yes, absolutely. This drives me crazy.